Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. Working capital of CA$-793.35K (current assets of CA$35.88K minus current liabilities of CA$829.23K) is measured against net assets of CA$-793.35K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See how many days can Oculus VisionTech Inc fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Oculus VisionTech Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Oculus VisionTech Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$-793.35K against net assets of CA$-793.35K CAD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see OVT asset base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check how resilient are Oculus VisionTech Inc's assets to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$-737.79K | CA$-737.79K | CA$32.20K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$-409.47K | CA$-409.47K | CA$39.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$-89.77K | CA$-89.77K | CA$183.96K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$415.42K | CA$415.42K | CA$717.84K | CA$302.42K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$122.62K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$328.20K | CA$328.20K | CA$496.27K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$248.30K | CA$248.30K | CA$383.72K | CA$135.42K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$-735.53K | CA$-735.53K | CA$6.76K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$-552.25K | CA$-552.25K | CA$28.87K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$-321.56K | CA$-321.56K | CA$68.58K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$131.68K | CA$131.68K | CA$193.44K | CA$61.75K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$18.77K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$-924.08K | CA$-924.08K | CA$37.61K | CA$961.69K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$-830.47K | CA$-830.47K | CA$11.44K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$-491.25K | CA$-491.25K | CA$107.42K | CA$598.67K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$-447.59K | CA$-447.59K | CA$20.08K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$-692.56K | CA$-692.56K | CA$52.67K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$-421.08K | CA$-421.08K | CA$3.06K | CA$424.13K | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2007 | 114.0% | CA$-232.31K | CA$-203.77K | CA$45.37K | CA$277.68K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2006 | 111.8% | CA$-302.28K | CA$-270.42K | CA$23.62K | CA$325.90K | ▼ -12.4 pp |
| 2005 | 124.2% | CA$-279.81K | CA$-225.29K | CA$35.08K | CA$314.89K | ▲ +11.0 pp |
| 2004 | 113.2% | CA$-529.00K | CA$-467.37K | CA$27.88K | CA$556.87K | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2003 | 107.8% | CA$-578.93K | CA$-537.10K | CA$70.71K | CA$649.64K | ▼ -23.5 pp |
| 2002 | 131.3% | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$-818.53K | CA$60.68K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +373.4 pp |
| 2001 | -242.1% | CA$-828.53K | CA$342.28K | CA$211.37K | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -166.8 pp |
| 2000 | -75.3% | CA$-269.82K | CA$358.28K | CA$534.85K | CA$804.67K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1999 | -75.0% | CA$-207.13K | CA$276.18K | CA$483.31K | CA$690.45K | ▼ -341.7 pp |
| 1998 | 266.7% | CA$-519.92K | CA$-194.97K | CA$194.97K | CA$714.89K | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 1997 | 300.0% | CA$-419.29K | CA$-139.76K | CA$209.64K | CA$628.93K | — |