Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.0% as of December 2025. Working capital of CA$-737.79K (current assets of CA$32.20K minus current liabilities of CA$769.98K) is measured against net assets of CA$-737.79K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Oculus VisionTech Inc balance sheet quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Oculus VisionTech Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Oculus VisionTech Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$-737.79K against net assets of CA$-737.79K CAD. Check Oculus VisionTech Inc tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see OVT company net worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$-737.79K | CA$-737.79K | CA$32.20K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$-409.47K | CA$-409.47K | CA$39.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$-89.77K | CA$-89.77K | CA$183.96K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$415.42K | CA$415.42K | CA$717.84K | CA$302.42K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$122.62K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$328.20K | CA$328.20K | CA$496.27K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$248.30K | CA$248.30K | CA$383.72K | CA$135.42K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$-735.53K | CA$-735.53K | CA$6.76K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$-552.25K | CA$-552.25K | CA$28.87K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$-321.56K | CA$-321.56K | CA$68.58K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$131.68K | CA$131.68K | CA$193.44K | CA$61.75K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$18.77K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$-924.08K | CA$-924.08K | CA$37.61K | CA$961.69K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$-830.47K | CA$-830.47K | CA$11.44K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$-491.25K | CA$-491.25K | CA$107.42K | CA$598.67K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$-447.59K | CA$-447.59K | CA$20.08K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$-692.56K | CA$-692.56K | CA$52.67K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$-421.08K | CA$-421.08K | CA$3.06K | CA$424.13K | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2007 | 114.0% | CA$-232.31K | CA$-203.77K | CA$45.37K | CA$277.68K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2006 | 111.8% | CA$-302.28K | CA$-270.42K | CA$23.62K | CA$325.90K | ▼ -12.4 pp |
| 2005 | 124.2% | CA$-279.81K | CA$-225.29K | CA$35.08K | CA$314.89K | ▲ +11.0 pp |
| 2004 | 113.2% | CA$-529.00K | CA$-467.37K | CA$27.88K | CA$556.87K | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2003 | 107.8% | CA$-578.93K | CA$-537.10K | CA$70.71K | CA$649.64K | ▼ -23.5 pp |
| 2002 | 131.3% | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$-818.53K | CA$60.68K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +373.4 pp |
| 2001 | -242.1% | CA$-828.53K | CA$342.28K | CA$211.37K | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -166.8 pp |
| 2000 | -75.3% | CA$-269.82K | CA$358.28K | CA$534.85K | CA$804.67K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1999 | -75.0% | CA$-207.13K | CA$276.18K | CA$483.31K | CA$690.45K | ▼ -341.7 pp |
| 1998 | 266.7% | CA$-519.92K | CA$-194.97K | CA$194.97K | CA$714.89K | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 1997 | 300.0% | CA$-419.29K | CA$-139.76K | CA$209.64K | CA$628.93K | — |