Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) — Net Asset Quality Index
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 35.5% as of December 2019. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of TL17.74 Million minus total liabilities of TL11.43 Million yields net assets of TL6.31 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See BURVA cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2003–2019)
This chart shows how Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2003 to 2019. As of December 2019, the index stands at 35.5%, representing net assets of TL6.31 Million against total assets of TL17.74 Million TRY. Explore BURVA cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2003–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2003 to 2019, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TRY) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 35.5% | TL6.31 Million | TL17.74 Million | TL11.43 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2018 | 36.7% | TL5.02 Million | TL13.67 Million | TL8.64 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 34.6% | TL5.01 Million | TL14.50 Million | TL9.49 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2016 | 35.5% | TL4.24 Million | TL11.93 Million | TL7.69 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2015 | 41.4% | TL3.83 Million | TL9.24 Million | TL5.42 Million | ▲ +21.2 pp |
| 2014 | 20.1% | TL1.56 Million | TL7.75 Million | TL6.19 Million | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2013 | 28.4% | TL2.15 Million | TL7.54 Million | TL5.40 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2012 | 21.6% | TL2.17 Million | TL10.07 Million | TL7.90 Million | ▼ -17.0 pp |
| 2011 | 38.6% | TL3.02 Million | TL7.82 Million | TL4.80 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2010 | 51.1% | TL4.22 Million | TL8.26 Million | TL4.04 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2009 | 52.8% | TL4.17 Million | TL7.90 Million | TL3.73 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2008 | 57.1% | TL4.93 Million | TL8.63 Million | TL3.70 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2007 | 64.3% | TL5.98 Million | TL9.29 Million | TL3.31 Million | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2006 | 55.3% | TL7.68 Million | TL13.88 Million | TL6.20 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2005 | 59.3% | TL8.04 Million | TL13.56 Million | TL5.52 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2004 | 65.6% | TL7.70 Million | TL11.73 Million | TL4.04 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2003 | 66.2% | TL6.28 Million | TL9.48 Million | TL3.20 Million | — |