Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Net Asset Quality Index
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS net asset quality index. Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 35.5% as of December 2019. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of TL17.74 Million minus total liabilities of TL11.43 Million yields net assets of TL6.31 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See shareholders equity of Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2003–2019)
Net asset quality index of Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2003 to 2019. This chart shows how Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2003 to 2019. As of December 2019, the index stands at 35.5%, representing net assets of TL6.31 Million against total assets of TL17.74 Million TRY. Check Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2003–2019)
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS net asset quality index by year from 2003 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2003 to 2019, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see BURVA company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TRY) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 35.5% | TL6.31 Million | TL17.74 Million | TL11.43 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2018 | 36.7% | TL5.02 Million | TL13.67 Million | TL8.64 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 34.6% | TL5.01 Million | TL14.50 Million | TL9.49 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2016 | 35.5% | TL4.24 Million | TL11.93 Million | TL7.69 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2015 | 41.4% | TL3.83 Million | TL9.24 Million | TL5.42 Million | ▲ +21.2 pp |
| 2014 | 20.1% | TL1.56 Million | TL7.75 Million | TL6.19 Million | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2013 | 28.4% | TL2.15 Million | TL7.54 Million | TL5.40 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2012 | 21.6% | TL2.17 Million | TL10.07 Million | TL7.90 Million | ▼ -17.0 pp |
| 2011 | 38.6% | TL3.02 Million | TL7.82 Million | TL4.80 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2010 | 51.1% | TL4.22 Million | TL8.26 Million | TL4.04 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2009 | 52.8% | TL4.17 Million | TL7.90 Million | TL3.73 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2008 | 57.1% | TL4.93 Million | TL8.63 Million | TL3.70 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2007 | 64.3% | TL5.98 Million | TL9.29 Million | TL3.31 Million | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2006 | 55.3% | TL7.68 Million | TL13.88 Million | TL6.20 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2005 | 59.3% | TL8.04 Million | TL13.56 Million | TL5.52 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2004 | 65.6% | TL7.70 Million | TL11.73 Million | TL4.04 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2003 | 66.2% | TL6.28 Million | TL9.48 Million | TL3.20 Million | — |