Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 71.0% as of December 2019. Strategic assets (PP&E of TL4.47 Million plus long-term investments of TL-) total TL4.47 Million, measured against net assets of TL6.31 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2003–2019)
This chart shows how Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2003 to 2019. As of December 2019, the index stands at 71.0%, representing strategic assets of TL4.47 Million against net assets of TL6.31 Million TRY. Explore BURVA cash flow metrics to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2003–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2003 to 2019, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see BURVA market cap overview.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (TRY) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 71.0% | TL4.47 Million | TL4.47 Million | TL- | TL6.31 Million | ▲ +18.6 pp |
| 2018 | 52.4% | TL2.63 Million | TL2.60 Million | TL25.00K | TL5.02 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2017 | 45.5% | TL2.28 Million | TL2.26 Million | TL25.00K | TL5.01 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2016 | 55.6% | TL2.36 Million | TL2.33 Million | TL25.00K | TL4.24 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2015 | 50.3% | TL1.92 Million | TL1.90 Million | TL25.00K | TL3.83 Million | ▼ -83.1 pp |
| 2014 | 133.4% | TL2.08 Million | TL2.06 Million | TL25.00K | TL1.56 Million | ▲ +101.4 pp |
| 2013 | 32.0% | TL687.00K | TL687.00K | TL- | TL2.15 Million | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2012 | 38.1% | TL829.00K | TL829.00K | TL- | TL2.17 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 37.5% | TL1.13 Million | TL1.13 Million | TL- | TL3.02 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2010 | 32.8% | TL1.39 Million | TL1.39 Million | TL- | TL4.22 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2009 | 38.8% | TL1.62 Million | TL1.62 Million | TL- | TL4.17 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2008 | 35.8% | TL1.76 Million | TL1.76 Million | TL- | TL4.93 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2007 | 37.1% | TL2.22 Million | TL2.22 Million | TL- | TL5.98 Million | ▼ -26.7 pp |
| 2006 | 63.8% | TL4.90 Million | TL4.90 Million | TL- | TL7.68 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2005 | 53.4% | TL4.29 Million | TL4.29 Million | TL- | TL8.04 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2004 | 62.7% | TL4.83 Million | TL4.83 Million | TL- | TL7.70 Million | ▼ -17.4 pp |
| 2003 | 80.2% | TL5.04 Million | TL5.04 Million | TL- | TL6.28 Million | — |