Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.8% as of December 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (TL15.07K) from net assets (TL6.31 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2003–2019)
This chart shows how Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2003 to 2019. As of December 2019, the ratio stands at 99.8%, reflecting net assets of TL6.31 Million with intangible assets of TL15.07K TRY. Also explore Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (BURVA) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2003–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2003 to 2019, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Burcelik Vana Sanayi ve Ticaret AS stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (TRY) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 99.8% | TL6.31 Million | TL15.07K | TL17.74 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 99.6% | TL5.02 Million | TL18.57K | TL13.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 99.6% | TL5.01 Million | TL19.62K | TL14.50 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 99.4% | TL4.24 Million | TL23.74K | TL11.93 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.5% | TL3.83 Million | TL19.14K | TL9.24 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2014 | 97.4% | TL1.56 Million | TL41.00K | TL7.75 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2013 | 97.2% | TL2.15 Million | TL61.00K | TL7.54 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 96.2% | TL2.17 Million | TL83.00K | TL10.07 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2011 | 99.9% | TL3.02 Million | TL2.00K | TL7.82 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 99.9% | TL4.22 Million | TL3.00K | TL8.26 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | TL4.17 Million | TL0.00 | TL7.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | TL4.93 Million | TL1.00K | TL8.63 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.9% | TL5.98 Million | TL5.00K | TL9.29 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2006 | 95.0% | TL7.68 Million | TL386.00K | TL13.88 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2005 | 95.2% | TL8.04 Million | TL389.00K | TL13.56 Million | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2004 | 99.6% | TL7.70 Million | TL28.00K | TL11.73 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2003 | 99.5% | TL6.28 Million | TL31.00K | TL9.48 Million | — |