Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A (ENMT3) — Net Asset Quality Index
Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A (ENMT3) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 25.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of R$15.50 Billion minus total liabilities of R$11.53 Billion yields net assets of R$3.97 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check ENMT3 cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 25.6%, representing net assets of R$3.97 Billion against total assets of R$15.50 Billion BRL. See ENMT3 working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de Energia S/A from 2000 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Energisa Mato Grosso - Distribuidora de (ENMT3) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (BRL) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30.1% | R$4.26 Billion | R$14.16 Billion | R$9.91 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2023 | 28.3% | R$3.76 Billion | R$13.28 Billion | R$9.52 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2022 | 26.2% | R$3.10 Billion | R$11.81 Billion | R$8.71 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2021 | 25.5% | R$2.88 Billion | R$11.29 Billion | R$8.41 Billion | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2020 | 29.4% | R$2.78 Billion | R$9.47 Billion | R$6.69 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2019 | 28.7% | R$2.22 Billion | R$7.74 Billion | R$5.52 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2018 | 26.5% | R$1.75 Billion | R$6.60 Billion | R$4.85 Billion | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2017 | 30.4% | R$1.80 Billion | R$5.92 Billion | R$4.12 Billion | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2016 | 33.7% | R$1.79 Billion | R$5.33 Billion | R$3.54 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2015 | 28.9% | R$1.35 Billion | R$4.67 Billion | R$3.32 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2014 | 29.9% | R$1.32 Billion | R$4.40 Billion | R$3.09 Billion | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2013 | 22.2% | R$816.95 Million | R$3.68 Billion | R$2.86 Billion | ▼ -10.2 pp |
| 2012 | 32.5% | R$1.24 Billion | R$3.82 Billion | R$2.58 Billion | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2011 | 36.0% | R$1.28 Billion | R$3.55 Billion | R$2.27 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 35.1% | R$1.17 Billion | R$3.33 Billion | R$2.16 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2009 | 36.3% | R$1.16 Billion | R$3.19 Billion | R$2.03 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 35.0% | R$1.13 Billion | R$3.23 Billion | R$2.10 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2007 | 38.4% | R$1.06 Billion | R$2.77 Billion | R$1.71 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 38.9% | R$1.01 Billion | R$2.58 Billion | R$1.58 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2005 | 36.8% | R$922.41 Million | R$2.50 Billion | R$1.58 Billion | ▲ +17.1 pp |
| 2004 | 19.7% | R$434.33 Million | R$2.20 Billion | R$1.77 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 21.3% | R$452.01 Million | R$2.12 Billion | R$1.67 Billion | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2002 | 25.2% | R$499.29 Million | R$1.98 Billion | R$1.48 Billion | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2001 | 30.5% | R$567.54 Million | R$1.86 Billion | R$1.30 Billion | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2000 | 21.9% | R$316.23 Million | R$1.44 Billion | R$1.13 Billion | — |