Lindab International AB (LIAB) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lindab International AB (LIAB) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 50.0% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of Skr14.63 Billion minus total liabilities of Skr7.31 Billion yields net assets of Skr7.32 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Lindab International AB liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lindab International AB Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Lindab International AB's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 50.0%, representing net assets of Skr7.32 Billion against total assets of Skr14.63 Billion SEK. Explore how efficiently does Lindab International AB generate cash to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lindab International AB (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lindab International AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Lindab International AB.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (SEK) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 50.0% | Skr7.32 Billion | Skr14.63 Billion | Skr7.31 Billion | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2024 | 47.7% | Skr7.36 Billion | Skr15.43 Billion | Skr8.07 Billion | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2023 | 53.4% | Skr7.24 Billion | Skr13.56 Billion | Skr6.32 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2022 | 52.1% | Skr6.75 Billion | Skr12.96 Billion | Skr6.21 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2021 | 54.8% | Skr5.65 Billion | Skr10.30 Billion | Skr4.66 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 55.1% | Skr5.18 Billion | Skr9.40 Billion | Skr4.23 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2019 | 53.3% | Skr5.03 Billion | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr4.41 Billion | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2018 | 57.2% | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr7.80 Billion | Skr3.34 Billion | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2017 | 53.4% | Skr4.13 Billion | Skr7.73 Billion | Skr3.60 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2016 | 51.3% | Skr3.85 Billion | Skr7.50 Billion | Skr3.65 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2015 | 49.1% | Skr3.51 Billion | Skr7.15 Billion | Skr3.64 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2014 | 48.0% | Skr3.34 Billion | Skr6.96 Billion | Skr3.62 Billion | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2013 | 45.5% | Skr2.97 Billion | Skr6.52 Billion | Skr3.55 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2012 | 41.0% | Skr2.71 Billion | Skr6.61 Billion | Skr3.90 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 41.7% | Skr2.70 Billion | Skr6.48 Billion | Skr3.78 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 41.9% | Skr2.75 Billion | Skr6.57 Billion | Skr3.81 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2009 | 40.4% | Skr3.00 Billion | Skr7.44 Billion | Skr4.44 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2008 | 38.8% | Skr3.35 Billion | Skr8.62 Billion | Skr5.28 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 38.6% | Skr2.97 Billion | Skr7.70 Billion | Skr4.73 Billion | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2006 | 30.9% | Skr2.19 Billion | Skr7.08 Billion | Skr4.89 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2005 | 43.7% | Skr2.85 Billion | Skr6.53 Billion | Skr3.67 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2004 | 45.2% | Skr2.31 Billion | Skr5.12 Billion | Skr2.80 Billion | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2003 | 42.7% | Skr2.21 Billion | Skr5.18 Billion | Skr2.97 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 42.5% | Skr2.25 Billion | Skr5.30 Billion | Skr3.05 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2001 | 40.9% | Skr1.46 Billion | Skr3.57 Billion | Skr2.11 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2000 | 40.0% | Skr1.31 Billion | Skr3.27 Billion | Skr1.96 Billion | — |