Lindab International AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Lindab International AB tangible net worth ratio. Lindab International AB (LIAB) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 91.8% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr596.00 Million) from net assets (Skr7.30 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore LIAB year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Lindab International AB (2000–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Lindab International AB from 2000 to 2025. This chart shows how Lindab International AB's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 91.8%, reflecting net assets of Skr7.30 Billion with intangible assets of Skr596.00 Million SEK. Check LIAB strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Lindab International AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Lindab International AB tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Lindab International AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see LIAB market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.6% | Skr7.32 Billion | Skr539.00 Million | Skr14.63 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 92.1% | Skr7.36 Billion | Skr583.00 Million | Skr15.43 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2023 | 95.9% | Skr7.24 Billion | Skr300.00 Million | Skr13.56 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 95.8% | Skr6.75 Billion | Skr282.00 Million | Skr12.96 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2021 | 98.2% | Skr5.65 Billion | Skr101.00 Million | Skr10.30 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2020 | 97.8% | Skr5.18 Billion | Skr112.00 Million | Skr9.40 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2019 | 98.0% | Skr5.03 Billion | Skr99.00 Million | Skr9.44 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2018 | 97.5% | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr110.00 Million | Skr7.80 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2017 | 96.7% | Skr4.13 Billion | Skr136.00 Million | Skr7.73 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2016 | 97.3% | Skr3.85 Billion | Skr103.00 Million | Skr7.50 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 96.5% | Skr3.51 Billion | Skr123.00 Million | Skr7.15 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2014 | 98.1% | Skr3.34 Billion | Skr64.00 Million | Skr6.96 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.0% | Skr2.97 Billion | Skr60.00 Million | Skr6.52 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.6% | Skr2.71 Billion | Skr65.00 Million | Skr6.61 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 97.6% | Skr2.70 Billion | Skr66.00 Million | Skr6.48 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.8% | Skr2.75 Billion | Skr61.00 Million | Skr6.57 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 98.4% | Skr3.00 Billion | Skr47.00 Million | Skr7.44 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2008 | 98.1% | Skr3.35 Billion | Skr63.00 Million | Skr8.62 Billion | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2007 | 109.3% | Skr2.97 Billion | Skr-277.00 Million | Skr7.70 Billion | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2006 | 111.9% | Skr2.19 Billion | Skr-260.00 Million | Skr7.08 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 110.9% | Skr2.85 Billion | Skr-310.00 Million | Skr6.53 Billion | ▲ +93.0 pp |
| 2004 | 17.9% | Skr2.31 Billion | Skr1.90 Billion | Skr5.12 Billion | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2003 | 9.0% | Skr2.21 Billion | Skr2.01 Billion | Skr5.18 Billion | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2002 | 4.8% | Skr2.25 Billion | Skr2.14 Billion | Skr5.30 Billion | ▼ -83.2 pp |
| 2001 | 88.0% | Skr1.46 Billion | Skr175.00 Million | Skr3.57 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2000 | 86.6% | Skr1.31 Billion | Skr175.00 Million | Skr3.27 Billion | — |