Vitrolife AB (VITR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Vitrolife AB (VITR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 72.0% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of Skr11.30 Billion minus total liabilities of Skr3.17 Billion yields net assets of Skr8.13 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Vitrolife AB (VITR) financial obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Vitrolife AB Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Vitrolife AB's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 72.0%, representing net assets of Skr8.13 Billion against total assets of Skr11.30 Billion SEK. For live market cap and overall valuation, see VITR stock market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Vitrolife AB (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Vitrolife AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Vitrolife AB (VITR) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (SEK) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 71.0% | Skr7.89 Billion | Skr11.12 Billion | Skr3.23 Billion | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2024 | 78.2% | Skr13.64 Billion | Skr17.45 Billion | Skr3.81 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2023 | 77.9% | Skr12.72 Billion | Skr16.33 Billion | Skr3.61 Billion | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2022 | 81.5% | Skr16.74 Billion | Skr20.55 Billion | Skr3.81 Billion | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2021 | 79.0% | Skr15.34 Billion | Skr19.43 Billion | Skr4.09 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2020 | 87.5% | Skr2.02 Billion | Skr2.31 Billion | Skr288.07 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2019 | 84.1% | Skr1.80 Billion | Skr2.14 Billion | Skr341.06 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2018 | 88.1% | Skr1.50 Billion | Skr1.70 Billion | Skr201.25 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 86.4% | Skr1.23 Billion | Skr1.42 Billion | Skr193.78 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 81.6% | Skr1.02 Billion | Skr1.25 Billion | Skr230.11 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 79.8% | Skr844.97 Million | Skr1.06 Billion | Skr214.27 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2014 | 72.2% | Skr702.57 Million | Skr972.48 Million | Skr269.91 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2013 | 66.1% | Skr322.60 Million | Skr487.81 Million | Skr165.21 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2012 | 60.4% | Skr278.98 Million | Skr462.20 Million | Skr183.22 Million | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2011 | 73.7% | Skr343.90 Million | Skr466.78 Million | Skr122.88 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2010 | 76.0% | Skr326.33 Million | Skr429.39 Million | Skr103.06 Million | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2009 | 86.9% | Skr312.07 Million | Skr359.31 Million | Skr47.25 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2008 | 85.3% | Skr292.39 Million | Skr342.66 Million | Skr50.27 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 84.6% | Skr253.38 Million | Skr299.46 Million | Skr46.08 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2006 | 81.4% | Skr220.64 Million | Skr271.03 Million | Skr50.40 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2005 | 83.5% | Skr176.45 Million | Skr211.37 Million | Skr34.92 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 81.2% | Skr150.57 Million | Skr185.54 Million | Skr34.96 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2003 | 78.0% | Skr143.44 Million | Skr184.00 Million | Skr40.56 Million | ▲ +18.9 pp |
| 2002 | 59.1% | Skr111.40 Million | Skr188.51 Million | Skr77.11 Million | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2001 | 73.7% | Skr241.74 Million | Skr328.04 Million | Skr86.30 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2000 | 76.8% | Skr133.06 Million | Skr173.22 Million | Skr40.15 Million | — |