Vitrolife AB (VITR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Vitrolife AB (VITR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 71.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of Skr11.24 Billion minus total liabilities of Skr3.17 Billion yields net assets of Skr8.07 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Vitrolife AB liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Vitrolife AB Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Vitrolife AB's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 71.8%, representing net assets of Skr8.07 Billion against total assets of Skr11.24 Billion SEK. See Vitrolife AB current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Vitrolife AB (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Vitrolife AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Vitrolife AB (VITR) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (SEK) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 71.0% | Skr7.89 Billion | Skr11.12 Billion | Skr3.23 Billion | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2024 | 78.2% | Skr13.64 Billion | Skr17.45 Billion | Skr3.81 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2023 | 77.9% | Skr12.72 Billion | Skr16.33 Billion | Skr3.61 Billion | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2022 | 81.5% | Skr16.74 Billion | Skr20.55 Billion | Skr3.81 Billion | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2021 | 79.0% | Skr15.34 Billion | Skr19.43 Billion | Skr4.09 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2020 | 87.5% | Skr2.02 Billion | Skr2.31 Billion | Skr288.07 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2019 | 84.1% | Skr1.80 Billion | Skr2.14 Billion | Skr341.06 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2018 | 88.1% | Skr1.50 Billion | Skr1.70 Billion | Skr201.25 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 86.4% | Skr1.23 Billion | Skr1.42 Billion | Skr193.78 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 81.6% | Skr1.02 Billion | Skr1.25 Billion | Skr230.11 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 79.8% | Skr844.97 Million | Skr1.06 Billion | Skr214.27 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2014 | 72.2% | Skr702.57 Million | Skr972.48 Million | Skr269.91 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2013 | 66.1% | Skr322.60 Million | Skr487.81 Million | Skr165.21 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2012 | 60.4% | Skr278.98 Million | Skr462.20 Million | Skr183.22 Million | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2011 | 73.7% | Skr343.90 Million | Skr466.78 Million | Skr122.88 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2010 | 76.0% | Skr326.33 Million | Skr429.39 Million | Skr103.06 Million | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2009 | 86.9% | Skr312.07 Million | Skr359.31 Million | Skr47.25 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2008 | 85.3% | Skr292.39 Million | Skr342.66 Million | Skr50.27 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 84.6% | Skr253.38 Million | Skr299.46 Million | Skr46.08 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2006 | 81.4% | Skr220.64 Million | Skr271.03 Million | Skr50.40 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2005 | 83.5% | Skr176.45 Million | Skr211.37 Million | Skr34.92 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 81.2% | Skr150.57 Million | Skr185.54 Million | Skr34.96 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2003 | 78.0% | Skr143.44 Million | Skr184.00 Million | Skr40.56 Million | ▲ +18.9 pp |
| 2002 | 59.1% | Skr111.40 Million | Skr188.51 Million | Skr77.11 Million | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2001 | 73.7% | Skr241.74 Million | Skr328.04 Million | Skr86.30 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2000 | 76.8% | Skr133.06 Million | Skr173.22 Million | Skr40.15 Million | — |