FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 0.8% as of September 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $199.00K plus long-term investments of $-) total $199.00K, measured against net assets of $25.25 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2007–2022)
This chart shows how FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2007 to 2022. As of September 2023, the index stands at 0.8%, representing strategic assets of $199.00K against net assets of $25.25 Million USD. Explore FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (2007–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock from 2007 to 2022, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock market cap and net worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0.2% | $46.00K | $46.00K | $- | $21.39 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2021 | 0.4% | $70.00K | $70.00K | $- | $17.35 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2020 | 0.8% | $98.00K | $98.00K | $- | $12.03 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2019 | 4.1% | $136.00K | $136.00K | $- | $3.34 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2018 | 8.2% | $189.00K | $189.00K | $- | $2.31 Million | ▼ -24.2 pp |
| 2017 | 32.4% | $295.00K | $295.00K | $- | $911.60K | ▲ +30.2 pp |
| 2016 | 2.1% | $223.70K | $171.00K | $52.70K | $10.53 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 2.8% | $279.50K | $226.80K | $52.70K | $10.11 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2014 | 0.0% | $3.11K | $3.11K | $- | $6.71 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2013 | 1.2% | $55.99K | $5.99K | $50.00K | $4.81 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 0.3% | $18.58K | $18.58K | $- | $5.81 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2011 | 1.3% | $42.89K | $42.89K | $- | $3.21 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2010 | 2.9% | $87.21K | $87.21K | $- | $2.98 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2009 | 5.9% | $232.95K | $232.95K | $- | $3.96 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 7.8% | $238.33K | $238.33K | $- | $3.07 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2007 | 7.2% | $92.98K | $92.98K | $- | $1.28 Million | — |