FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock working capital to net assets ratio. FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 20.3% as of June 2026. Working capital of $9.64 Million (current assets of $30.55 Million minus current liabilities of $20.91 Million) is measured against net assets of $47.37 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check FTLF intangible-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (2005–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 20.3%, reflecting working capital of $9.64 Million against net assets of $47.37 Million USD. See how many days can FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see FTLF total asset value.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.3% | $11.46 Million | $43.64 Million | $33.07 Million | $21.61 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2024 | 18.9% | $6.83 Million | $36.13 Million | $18.14 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2023 | 16.1% | $4.36 Million | $27.04 Million | $14.69 Million | $10.34 Million | ▼ -47.3 pp |
| 2022 | 63.4% | $13.57 Million | $21.39 Million | $17.66 Million | $4.09 Million | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2021 | 78.6% | $13.63 Million | $17.35 Million | $17.68 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +14.2 pp |
| 2020 | 64.4% | $7.74 Million | $12.03 Million | $11.87 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2019 | 87.5% | $2.92 Million | $3.34 Million | $5.70 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2018 | 81.7% | $1.89 Million | $2.31 Million | $5.44 Million | $3.55 Million | ▲ +41.1 pp |
| 2017 | 40.5% | $369.50K | $911.60K | $6.32 Million | $5.95 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2016 | 33.1% | $3.48 Million | $10.53 Million | $8.13 Million | $4.64 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2015 | 29.7% | $3.00 Million | $10.11 Million | $9.54 Million | $6.53 Million | ▼ -76.2 pp |
| 2014 | 105.9% | $7.11 Million | $6.71 Million | $9.06 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 117.7% | $5.66 Million | $4.81 Million | $8.13 Million | $2.47 Million | ▲ +39.7 pp |
| 2012 | 78.0% | $4.53 Million | $5.81 Million | $6.40 Million | $1.87 Million | ▲ +25.6 pp |
| 2011 | 52.4% | $1.68 Million | $3.21 Million | $3.30 Million | $1.62 Million | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2010 | 40.0% | $1.19 Million | $2.98 Million | $2.55 Million | $1.35 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2009 | 45.5% | $1.80 Million | $3.96 Million | $3.64 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +20.0 pp |
| 2008 | 25.5% | $781.60K | $3.07 Million | $2.96 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -67.1 pp |
| 2007 | 92.6% | $1.19 Million | $1.28 Million | $1.22 Million | $30.25K | ▲ +67.0 pp |
| 2006 | 25.5% | $-182.74K | $-715.47K | $60.75K | $243.50K | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2005 | 31.7% | $-48.77K | $-153.72K | $35.31K | $84.08K | — |