FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 20.3% as of June 2026. Working capital of $9.64 Million (current assets of $30.55 Million minus current liabilities of $20.91 Million) is measured against net assets of $47.37 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See how many days can FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock Working Capital to Net Assets (2005–2025)
This chart shows how FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 20.3%, reflecting working capital of $9.64 Million against net assets of $47.37 Million USD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock assets under control.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (2005–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Explore FTLF strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.3% | $11.46 Million | $43.64 Million | $33.07 Million | $21.61 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2024 | 18.9% | $6.83 Million | $36.13 Million | $18.14 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2023 | 16.1% | $4.36 Million | $27.04 Million | $14.69 Million | $10.34 Million | ▼ -47.3 pp |
| 2022 | 63.4% | $13.57 Million | $21.39 Million | $17.66 Million | $4.09 Million | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2021 | 78.6% | $13.63 Million | $17.35 Million | $17.68 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +14.2 pp |
| 2020 | 64.4% | $7.74 Million | $12.03 Million | $11.87 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2019 | 87.5% | $2.92 Million | $3.34 Million | $5.70 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2018 | 81.7% | $1.89 Million | $2.31 Million | $5.44 Million | $3.55 Million | ▲ +41.1 pp |
| 2017 | 40.5% | $369.50K | $911.60K | $6.32 Million | $5.95 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2016 | 33.1% | $3.48 Million | $10.53 Million | $8.13 Million | $4.64 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2015 | 29.7% | $3.00 Million | $10.11 Million | $9.54 Million | $6.53 Million | ▼ -76.2 pp |
| 2014 | 105.9% | $7.11 Million | $6.71 Million | $9.06 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 117.7% | $5.66 Million | $4.81 Million | $8.13 Million | $2.47 Million | ▲ +39.7 pp |
| 2012 | 78.0% | $4.53 Million | $5.81 Million | $6.40 Million | $1.87 Million | ▲ +25.6 pp |
| 2011 | 52.4% | $1.68 Million | $3.21 Million | $3.30 Million | $1.62 Million | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2010 | 40.0% | $1.19 Million | $2.98 Million | $2.55 Million | $1.35 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2009 | 45.5% | $1.80 Million | $3.96 Million | $3.64 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +20.0 pp |
| 2008 | 25.5% | $781.60K | $3.07 Million | $2.96 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -67.1 pp |
| 2007 | 92.6% | $1.19 Million | $1.28 Million | $1.22 Million | $30.25K | ▲ +67.0 pp |
| 2006 | 25.5% | $-182.74K | $-715.47K | $60.75K | $243.50K | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2005 | 31.7% | $-48.77K | $-153.72K | $35.31K | $84.08K | — |