Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 134.9% as of December 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $3.52 Billion plus long-term investments of $-) total $3.52 Billion, measured against net assets of $2.61 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Boyd Gaming Corporation Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Boyd Gaming Corporation's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 134.9%, representing strategic assets of $3.52 Billion against net assets of $2.61 Billion USD. Explore BYD operating cash flow to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Boyd Gaming Corporation (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Boyd Gaming Corporation from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see BYD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 134.9% | $3.52 Billion | $3.52 Billion | $- | $2.61 Billion | ▼ -81.0 pp |
| 2024 | 215.9% | $3.41 Billion | $3.41 Billion | $- | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +24.7 pp |
| 2023 | 191.3% | $3.34 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $- | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +40.7 pp |
| 2022 | 150.5% | $2.39 Billion | $2.39 Billion | $- | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -62.5 pp |
| 2021 | 213.1% | $3.28 Billion | $3.28 Billion | $- | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2020 | 224.7% | $2.53 Billion | $2.53 Billion | $- | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2019 | 212.5% | $2.69 Billion | $2.67 Billion | $15.60 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.9 pp |
| 2018 | 238.4% | $2.73 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $15.30 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2017 | 233.0% | $2.56 Billion | $2.54 Billion | $17.30 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -45.8 pp |
| 2016 | 278.9% | $2.61 Billion | $2.61 Billion | $0.00 | $934.13 Million | ▼ -207.3 pp |
| 2015 | 486.2% | $2.47 Billion | $2.23 Billion | $244.62 Million | $508.01 Million | ▼ -21.0 pp |
| 2014 | 507.2% | $2.51 Billion | $2.29 Billion | $222.72 Million | $494.63 Million | ▼ -31.7 pp |
| 2013 | 539.0% | $3.51 Billion | $3.51 Billion | $- | $650.44 Million | ▼ -237.1 pp |
| 2012 | 776.0% | $3.62 Billion | $3.62 Billion | $- | $467.13 Million | ▲ +438.9 pp |
| 2011 | 337.1% | $4.63 Billion | $4.63 Billion | $- | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2010 | 329.6% | $4.59 Billion | $4.59 Billion | $- | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +56.4 pp |
| 2009 | 273.2% | $3.16 Billion | $3.16 Billion | $- | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2008 | 284.1% | $3.25 Billion | $3.25 Billion | $- | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +88.1 pp |
| 2007 | 196.0% | $2.72 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $- | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2006 | 191.9% | $2.13 Billion | $2.13 Billion | $- | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -57.2 pp |
| 2005 | 249.0% | $2.73 Billion | $2.73 Billion | $- | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2004 | 241.3% | $2.28 Billion | $2.28 Billion | $- | $943.77 Million | ▲ +24.0 pp |
| 2003 | 217.3% | $958.82 Million | $958.82 Million | $- | $441.25 Million | ▼ -17.3 pp |
| 2002 | 234.6% | $958.60 Million | $958.60 Million | $- | $408.56 Million | ▼ -42.5 pp |
| 2001 | 277.2% | $980.40 Million | $980.40 Million | $- | $353.74 Million | ▼ -13.9 pp |
| 2000 | 291.1% | $959.97 Million | $959.97 Million | $- | $329.78 Million | — |