Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS tangible net worth ratio. Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS (DOHOL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 75.6% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (TL27.44 Billion) from net assets (TL112.32 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check DOHOL strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS (2000–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS from 2000 to 2025. This chart shows how Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 75.6%, reflecting net assets of TL112.32 Billion with intangible assets of TL27.44 Billion TRY. See Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see DOHOL market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (TRY) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.0% | TL97.37 Billion | TL18.53 Billion | TL184.60 Billion | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 2024 | 75.5% | TL74.04 Billion | TL18.14 Billion | TL139.67 Billion | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2023 | 83.0% | TL79.84 Billion | TL13.59 Billion | TL134.88 Billion | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2022 | 89.6% | TL23.50 Billion | TL2.44 Billion | TL42.23 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2021 | 91.4% | TL14.32 Billion | TL1.23 Billion | TL22.29 Billion | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2020 | 88.7% | TL9.38 Billion | TL1.06 Billion | TL13.69 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2019 | 92.1% | TL7.63 Billion | TL599.60 Million | TL11.24 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2018 | 90.2% | TL7.00 Billion | TL683.23 Million | TL10.95 Billion | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2017 | 68.4% | TL3.00 Billion | TL947.60 Million | TL9.28 Billion | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2016 | 63.0% | TL3.02 Billion | TL1.12 Billion | TL7.83 Billion | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2015 | 68.6% | TL3.04 Billion | TL953.97 Million | TL7.45 Billion | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2014 | 57.1% | TL2.91 Billion | TL1.25 Billion | TL6.88 Billion | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2013 | 60.6% | TL4.00 Billion | TL1.58 Billion | TL7.59 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 60.9% | TL4.09 Billion | TL1.60 Billion | TL8.67 Billion | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2011 | 67.1% | TL3.85 Billion | TL1.27 Billion | TL8.65 Billion | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2010 | 62.0% | TL4.62 Billion | TL1.76 Billion | TL8.03 Billion | ▲ +33.4 pp |
| 2009 | 28.6% | TL4.24 Billion | TL3.03 Billion | TL9.54 Billion | ▼ -9.1 pp |
| 2008 | 37.7% | TL4.71 Billion | TL2.93 Billion | TL10.61 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2007 | 43.8% | TL4.96 Billion | TL2.79 Billion | TL9.07 Billion | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2006 | 51.7% | TL4.17 Billion | TL2.01 Billion | TL7.90 Billion | ▲ +40.3 pp |
| 2005 | 11.4% | TL3.40 Billion | TL3.02 Billion | TL8.01 Billion | ▼ -38.7 pp |
| 2004 | 50.0% | TL2.95 Billion | TL1.47 Billion | TL11.75 Billion | ▲ +10.5 pp |
| 2003 | 39.5% | TL2289.54 Trillion | TL1385.72 Trillion | TL9125.62 Trillion | ▲ +27.1 pp |
| 2002 | 12.4% | TL1469.62 Trillion | TL1287.42 Trillion | TL8024.64 Trillion | ▼ -16.2 pp |
| 2001 | 28.6% | TL1040.58 Trillion | TL743.25 Trillion | TL5045.81 Trillion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2000 | 36.6% | TL623.69 Trillion | TL395.58 Trillion | TL2978.83 Trillion | — |