Digital Ally Inc (DGLY) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Digital Ally Inc (DGLY) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 64.7% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($2.65 Million) from net assets ($7.52 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Digital Ally Inc short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Digital Ally Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2005–2023)
This chart shows how Digital Ally Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2005 to 2023. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 64.7%, reflecting net assets of $7.52 Million with intangible assets of $2.65 Million USD. See Digital Ally Inc defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Digital Ally Inc (2005–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Digital Ally Inc from 2005 to 2023, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see DGLY stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 55.1% | $11.45 Million | $5.14 Million | $47.03 Million | ▼ -27.0 pp |
| 2022 | 82.1% | $36.34 Million | $6.51 Million | $56.67 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2021 | 87.5% | $55.86 Million | $6.97 Million | $82.99 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2020 | 97.3% | $14.36 Million | $392.56K | $20.80 Million | ▲ +54.8 pp |
| 2017 | 42.4% | $863.75K | $497.18K | $13.17 Million | ▼ -51.5 pp |
| 2016 | 94.0% | $7.76 Million | $467.18K | $18.84 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2015 | 97.8% | $18.76 Million | $410.26K | $23.47 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2014 | 96.1% | $6.26 Million | $245.68K | $18.87 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 96.2% | $7.05 Million | $267.28K | $13.01 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 97.2% | $7.90 Million | $217.66K | $13.34 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 97.6% | $9.31 Million | $226.80K | $13.40 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 97.6% | $12.19 Million | $293.58K | $17.61 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2009 | 98.1% | $17.57 Million | $336.18K | $21.40 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2008 | 97.8% | $17.16 Million | $376.82K | $21.09 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $9.12 Million | $0.00 | $10.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $1.92 Million | $0.00 | $3.78 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $1.69 Million | $0.00 | $2.28 Million | — |