Bath & Body Works Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bath & Body Works Inc. tangible net worth ratio. Bath & Body Works Inc. (BBWI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -2063.2% as of January 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($411.00 Million) from net assets ($19.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset growth rate of Bath & Body Works Inc. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Bath & Body Works Inc. (1986–2015)
Tangible net worth ratio of Bath & Body Works Inc. from 1986 to 2015. This chart shows how Bath & Body Works Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 28 annual periods from 1986 to 2015. As of January 2015, the ratio stands at -2063.2%, reflecting net assets of $19.00 Million with intangible assets of $411.00 Million USD.
Bath & Body Works Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1986–2015)
Bath & Body Works Inc. tangible net worth ratio by year from 1986 to 2015. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bath & Body Works Inc. from 1986 to 2015, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Bath & Body Works Inc. worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -2063.2% | $19.00 Million | $411.00 Million | $7.54 Billion | ▼ -1804.5 pp |
| 2012 | -258.7% | $138.00 Million | $495.00 Million | $6.11 Billion | ▼ -318.6 pp |
| 2011 | 59.9% | $1.48 Billion | $592.00 Million | $6.45 Billion | ▼ -12.9 pp |
| 2010 | 72.8% | $2.18 Billion | $594.00 Million | $7.17 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2009 | 69.1% | $1.88 Billion | $580.00 Million | $6.97 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 70.2% | $2.27 Billion | $677.00 Million | $7.44 Billion | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2007 | 78.8% | $3.03 Billion | $642.00 Million | $7.09 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 82.1% | $2.50 Billion | $447.00 Million | $6.35 Billion | ▲ +58.2 pp |
| 2005 | 24.0% | $2.37 Billion | $1.80 Billion | $6.09 Billion | ▼ -42.7 pp |
| 2004 | 66.7% | $5.27 Billion | $1.75 Billion | $7.87 Billion | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2003 | 63.8% | $4.86 Billion | $1.76 Billion | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -31.0 pp |
| 2002 | 94.8% | $2.92 Billion | $152.00 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $2.46 Billion | $0.00 | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $2.27 Billion | $0.00 | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.34 Billion | $0.00 | $4.55 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $2.15 Billion | $0.00 | $4.30 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $1.99 Billion | $0.00 | $4.12 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $3.25 Billion | $0.00 | $5.27 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $2.76 Billion | $0.00 | $4.57 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $2.44 Billion | $0.00 | $4.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $2.27 Billion | $0.00 | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $1.88 Billion | $0.00 | $3.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $1.56 Billion | $0.00 | $2.87 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $1.24 Billion | $0.00 | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $946.20 Million | $0.00 | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $729.20 Million | $0.00 | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $781.50 Million | $0.00 | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $404.10 Million | $0.00 | $1.21 Billion | — |