Bath & Body Works Inc. (BBWI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bath & Body Works Inc. (BBWI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -2063.2% as of January 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($411.00 Million) from net assets ($19.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Bath & Body Works Inc. (BBWI) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Bath & Body Works Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1986–2015)
This chart shows how Bath & Body Works Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 28 annual periods from 1986 to 2015. As of January 2015, the ratio stands at -2063.2%, reflecting net assets of $19.00 Million with intangible assets of $411.00 Million USD. See BBWI defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bath & Body Works Inc. (1986–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bath & Body Works Inc. from 1986 to 2015, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Bath & Body Works Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -2063.2% | $19.00 Million | $411.00 Million | $7.54 Billion | ▼ -1804.5 pp |
| 2012 | -258.7% | $138.00 Million | $495.00 Million | $6.11 Billion | ▼ -318.6 pp |
| 2011 | 59.9% | $1.48 Billion | $592.00 Million | $6.45 Billion | ▼ -12.9 pp |
| 2010 | 72.8% | $2.18 Billion | $594.00 Million | $7.17 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2009 | 69.1% | $1.88 Billion | $580.00 Million | $6.97 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 70.2% | $2.27 Billion | $677.00 Million | $7.44 Billion | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2007 | 78.8% | $3.03 Billion | $642.00 Million | $7.09 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 82.1% | $2.50 Billion | $447.00 Million | $6.35 Billion | ▲ +58.2 pp |
| 2005 | 24.0% | $2.37 Billion | $1.80 Billion | $6.09 Billion | ▼ -42.7 pp |
| 2004 | 66.7% | $5.27 Billion | $1.75 Billion | $7.87 Billion | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2003 | 63.8% | $4.86 Billion | $1.76 Billion | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -31.0 pp |
| 2002 | 94.8% | $2.92 Billion | $152.00 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $2.46 Billion | $0.00 | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $2.27 Billion | $0.00 | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.34 Billion | $0.00 | $4.55 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $2.15 Billion | $0.00 | $4.30 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $1.99 Billion | $0.00 | $4.12 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $3.25 Billion | $0.00 | $5.27 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $2.76 Billion | $0.00 | $4.57 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $2.44 Billion | $0.00 | $4.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $2.27 Billion | $0.00 | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $1.88 Billion | $0.00 | $3.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $1.56 Billion | $0.00 | $2.87 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $1.24 Billion | $0.00 | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $946.20 Million | $0.00 | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $729.20 Million | $0.00 | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $781.50 Million | $0.00 | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $404.10 Million | $0.00 | $1.21 Billion | — |