Celanese Corporation (CE) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Celanese Corporation (CE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 30.5% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.12 Billion) from net assets ($4.49 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CE net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Celanese Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Celanese Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 30.5%, reflecting net assets of $4.49 Billion with intangible assets of $3.12 Billion USD. See Celanese Corporation defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Celanese Corporation (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Celanese Corporation from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CE company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28.8% | $4.47 Billion | $3.18 Billion | $21.70 Billion | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2024 | 35.1% | $5.61 Billion | $3.64 Billion | $22.86 Billion | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2023 | 47.4% | $7.55 Billion | $3.98 Billion | $26.60 Billion | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2022 | 32.8% | $6.11 Billion | $4.11 Billion | $26.27 Billion | ▼ -51.0 pp |
| 2021 | 83.8% | $4.54 Billion | $735.00 Million | $11.97 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2020 | 91.8% | $3.90 Billion | $319.00 Million | $10.91 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2019 | 89.2% | $2.90 Billion | $312.00 Million | $9.48 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2018 | 90.8% | $3.38 Billion | $310.00 Million | $9.31 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 90.9% | $3.30 Billion | $301.00 Million | $9.54 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2016 | 93.6% | $3.02 Billion | $194.00 Million | $8.36 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 95.6% | $2.83 Billion | $125.00 Million | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 95.7% | $3.08 Billion | $132.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $2.70 Billion | $142.00 Million | $9.02 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2012 | 90.5% | $1.73 Billion | $165.00 Million | $9.16 Billion | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2011 | 85.3% | $1.34 Billion | $197.00 Million | $8.52 Billion | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2010 | 72.7% | $924.00 Million | $252.00 Million | $8.28 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2009 | 49.7% | $584.00 Million | $294.00 Million | $8.41 Billion | ▲ +147.5 pp |
| 2008 | -97.8% | $184.00 Million | $364.00 Million | $7.17 Billion | ▼ -158.0 pp |
| 2007 | 60.2% | $1.07 Billion | $425.00 Million | $8.06 Billion | ▲ +13.9 pp |
| 2006 | 46.2% | $861.00 Million | $463.00 Million | $7.89 Billion | ▲ +107.1 pp |
| 2005 | -60.9% | $299.00 Million | $481.00 Million | $7.45 Billion | ▼ -62.3 pp |
| 2004 | 1.5% | $406.00 Million | $400.00 Million | $7.41 Billion | ▼ -48.1 pp |
| 2003 | 49.6% | $2.60 Billion | $1.31 Billion | $6.81 Billion | ▼ -50.4 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.10 Billion | $0.00 | $6.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $1.95 Billion | $0.00 | $6.23 Billion | — |