Celanese Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Celanese Corporation tangible net worth ratio. Celanese Corporation (CE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 33.0% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.08 Billion) from net assets ($4.59 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Celanese Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Celanese Corporation (2001–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Celanese Corporation from 2001 to 2025. This chart shows how Celanese Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 33.0%, reflecting net assets of $4.59 Billion with intangible assets of $3.08 Billion USD. Check Celanese Corporation PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Celanese Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Celanese Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Celanese Corporation from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CE stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28.8% | $4.47 Billion | $3.18 Billion | $21.70 Billion | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2024 | 35.1% | $5.61 Billion | $3.64 Billion | $22.86 Billion | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2023 | 47.4% | $7.55 Billion | $3.98 Billion | $26.60 Billion | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2022 | 32.8% | $6.11 Billion | $4.11 Billion | $26.27 Billion | ▼ -51.0 pp |
| 2021 | 83.8% | $4.54 Billion | $735.00 Million | $11.97 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2020 | 91.8% | $3.90 Billion | $319.00 Million | $10.91 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2019 | 89.2% | $2.90 Billion | $312.00 Million | $9.48 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2018 | 90.8% | $3.38 Billion | $310.00 Million | $9.31 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 90.9% | $3.30 Billion | $301.00 Million | $9.54 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2016 | 93.6% | $3.02 Billion | $194.00 Million | $8.36 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 95.6% | $2.83 Billion | $125.00 Million | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 95.7% | $3.08 Billion | $132.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $2.70 Billion | $142.00 Million | $9.02 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2012 | 90.5% | $1.73 Billion | $165.00 Million | $9.16 Billion | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2011 | 85.3% | $1.34 Billion | $197.00 Million | $8.52 Billion | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2010 | 72.7% | $924.00 Million | $252.00 Million | $8.28 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2009 | 49.7% | $584.00 Million | $294.00 Million | $8.41 Billion | ▲ +147.5 pp |
| 2008 | -97.8% | $184.00 Million | $364.00 Million | $7.17 Billion | ▼ -158.0 pp |
| 2007 | 60.2% | $1.07 Billion | $425.00 Million | $8.06 Billion | ▲ +13.9 pp |
| 2006 | 46.2% | $861.00 Million | $463.00 Million | $7.89 Billion | ▲ +107.1 pp |
| 2005 | -60.9% | $299.00 Million | $481.00 Million | $7.45 Billion | ▼ -62.3 pp |
| 2004 | 1.5% | $406.00 Million | $400.00 Million | $7.41 Billion | ▼ -48.1 pp |
| 2003 | 49.6% | $2.60 Billion | $1.31 Billion | $6.81 Billion | ▼ -50.4 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.10 Billion | $0.00 | $6.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $1.95 Billion | $0.00 | $6.23 Billion | — |