Under Armour Inc C (UA) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Under Armour Inc C (UA) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.7% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($4.47 Million) from net assets ($1.41 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Under Armour Inc C (UA) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Under Armour Inc C Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2026)
This chart shows how Under Armour Inc C's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 48 annual periods from 2001 to 2026. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 99.7%, reflecting net assets of $1.41 Billion with intangible assets of $4.47 Million USD. Also explore UA net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Under Armour Inc C (2001–2026)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Under Armour Inc C from 2001 to 2026, covering 48 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Under Armour Inc C.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 99.7% | $1.41 Billion | $4.47 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2025 | 99.7% | $1.89 Billion | $5.22 Million | $4.30 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 99.7% | $2.15 Billion | $7.00 Million | $4.76 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 99.7% | $2.15 Billion | $7.00 Million | $4.76 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2023 | 99.5% | $1.97 Billion | $8.94 Million | $4.83 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 99.6% | $2.00 Billion | $8.94 Million | $4.86 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2022 | 99.4% | $1.73 Billion | $10.58 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2021 | 99.5% | $2.09 Billion | $11.01 Million | $4.99 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 99.2% | $1.68 Billion | $13.29 Million | $5.03 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 99.2% | $1.68 Billion | $13.29 Million | $5.03 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2020 | 98.3% | $2.15 Billion | $36.35 Million | $4.84 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 98.3% | $2.15 Billion | $36.34 Million | $4.84 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2019 | 97.9% | $2.02 Billion | $41.79 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 97.9% | $2.02 Billion | $41.79 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 97.7% | $2.02 Billion | $46.99 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 97.7% | $2.02 Billion | $46.99 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2017 | 96.8% | $2.03 Billion | $64.31 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 96.8% | $2.03 Billion | $64.31 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2016 | 95.5% | $1.67 Billion | $75.69 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 95.5% | $1.67 Billion | $75.69 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2015 | 98.1% | $1.35 Billion | $26.23 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 98.1% | $1.35 Billion | $26.23 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 97.7% | $1.05 Billion | $24.10 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 97.7% | $1.05 Billion | $24.10 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2013 | 99.5% | $816.92 Million | $4.48 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.5% | $816.92 Million | $4.48 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 99.1% | $636.43 Million | $5.54 Million | $919.21 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 99.0% | $636.43 Million | $6.28 Million | $919.21 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 99.2% | $496.97 Million | $3.91 Million | $675.38 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 99.2% | $496.97 Million | $3.91 Million | $675.38 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 98.6% | $400.00 Million | $5.68 Million | $545.59 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 98.6% | $400.00 Million | $5.68 Million | $545.59 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 98.3% | $331.10 Million | $5.47 Million | $487.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 98.3% | $331.10 Million | $5.47 Million | $487.56 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 97.7% | $280.49 Million | $6.47 Million | $390.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 97.7% | $280.49 Million | $6.47 Million | $390.61 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2007 | 96.3% | $214.39 Million | $7.88 Million | $289.37 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 96.3% | $214.39 Million | $7.88 Million | $289.37 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $150.83 Million | $0.00 | $203.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $150.83 Million | $0.00 | $203.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $21.24 Million | $0.00 | $110.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $21.24 Million | $0.00 | $110.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $11.87 Million | $0.00 | $54.73 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $11.87 Million | $0.00 | $54.73 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $2.83 Million | $0.00 | $29.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.83 Million | $0.00 | $29.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.82 Million | $0.00 | $9.54 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $2.82 Million | $0.00 | $9.54 Million | — |