Under Armour Inc C (UA) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Under Armour Inc C (UA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 74.3% as of June 2026. Working capital of $1.06 Billion (current assets of $2.37 Billion minus current liabilities of $1.31 Billion) is measured against net assets of $1.43 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See UA cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Under Armour Inc C Working Capital to Net Assets (2003–2026)
This chart shows how Under Armour Inc C's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 44 annual periods from 2003 to 2026. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 74.3%, reflecting working capital of $1.06 Billion against net assets of $1.43 Billion USD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see UA asset base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Under Armour Inc C (2003–2026)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Under Armour Inc C from 2003 to 2026, covering 44 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check UA financial resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 73.7% | $1.04 Billion | $1.41 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2025 | 64.5% | $1.22 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $2.33 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2024 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 80.8% | $1.59 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $2.95 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2022 | 80.2% | $1.60 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $2.96 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2022 | 88.7% | $1.53 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $2.83 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2021 | 90.3% | $1.89 Billion | $2.09 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2021 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +48.4 pp |
| 2020 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2019 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 63.0% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $685.82 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2015 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2014 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2013 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2009 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2005 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▼ -37.9 pp |
| 2004 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | — |