Under Armour Inc C Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Under Armour Inc C working capital to net assets ratio. Under Armour Inc C (UA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 74.3% as of June 2026. Working capital of $1.06 Billion (current assets of $2.37 Billion minus current liabilities of $1.31 Billion) is measured against net assets of $1.43 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Under Armour Inc C (2003–2026)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Under Armour Inc C from 2003 to 2026. This chart shows how Under Armour Inc C's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 44 annual periods from 2003 to 2026. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 74.3%, reflecting working capital of $1.06 Billion against net assets of $1.43 Billion USD. Explore UA long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Under Armour Inc C Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2003–2026)
Under Armour Inc C working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2003 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Under Armour Inc C from 2003 to 2026, covering 44 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see UA asset base.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 73.7% | $1.04 Billion | $1.41 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2025 | 64.5% | $1.22 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $2.33 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2024 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 80.8% | $1.59 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $2.95 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2022 | 80.2% | $1.60 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $2.96 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2022 | 88.7% | $1.53 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $2.83 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2021 | 90.3% | $1.89 Billion | $2.09 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2021 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +48.4 pp |
| 2020 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2019 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 63.0% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $685.82 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2015 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2014 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2013 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2009 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2005 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▼ -37.9 pp |
| 2004 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | — |