Paranapanema S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Paranapanema S.A tangible net worth ratio. Paranapanema S.A (PMAM3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 85.3% as of March 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$9.33 Million) from net assets (R$63.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check PMAM3 strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Paranapanema S.A (2000–2019)
Tangible net worth ratio of Paranapanema S.A from 2000 to 2019. This chart shows how Paranapanema S.A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2000 to 2019. As of March 2020, the ratio stands at 85.3%, reflecting net assets of R$63.58 Million with intangible assets of R$9.33 Million BRL. See Paranapanema S.A short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Paranapanema S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2019)
Paranapanema S.A tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Paranapanema S.A from 2000 to 2019, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Paranapanema S.A market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 98.4% | R$621.40 Million | R$10.06 Million | R$3.87 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 98.3% | R$602.50 Million | R$10.16 Million | R$4.62 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 99.3% | R$888.52 Million | R$6.45 Million | R$4.21 Billion | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2016 | 96.4% | R$257.01 Million | R$9.34 Million | R$3.54 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2015 | 97.4% | R$344.48 Million | R$8.81 Million | R$5.31 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2014 | 99.6% | R$1.20 Billion | R$4.99 Million | R$4.96 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.7% | R$1.38 Billion | R$4.44 Million | R$4.43 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.6% | R$1.46 Billion | R$5.18 Million | R$4.19 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 99.8% | R$1.66 Billion | R$3.73 Million | R$3.78 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 99.6% | R$1.77 Billion | R$7.44 Million | R$3.73 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 99.2% | R$1.41 Billion | R$11.49 Million | R$2.85 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 98.7% | R$1.21 Billion | R$16.14 Million | R$3.32 Billion | ▲ +1595.3 pp |
| 2006 | -1496.7% | R$68.58 Million | R$1.10 Billion | R$3.61 Billion | ▼ -1596.7 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | R$108.23 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.07 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | R$87.45 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | R$247.32 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.06 Billion | — |