Paranapanema S.A (PMAM3) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Paranapanema S.A (PMAM3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 85.3% as of March 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$9.33 Million) from net assets (R$63.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Paranapanema S.A shareholders equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Paranapanema S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2019)
This chart shows how Paranapanema S.A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2000 to 2019. As of March 2020, the ratio stands at 85.3%, reflecting net assets of R$63.58 Million with intangible assets of R$9.33 Million BRL. Also explore Paranapanema S.A (PMAM3) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Paranapanema S.A (2000–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Paranapanema S.A from 2000 to 2019, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see PMAM3 market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 98.4% | R$621.40 Million | R$10.06 Million | R$3.87 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 98.3% | R$602.50 Million | R$10.16 Million | R$4.62 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 99.3% | R$888.52 Million | R$6.45 Million | R$4.21 Billion | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2016 | 96.4% | R$257.01 Million | R$9.34 Million | R$3.54 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2015 | 97.4% | R$344.48 Million | R$8.81 Million | R$5.31 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2014 | 99.6% | R$1.20 Billion | R$4.99 Million | R$4.96 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.7% | R$1.38 Billion | R$4.44 Million | R$4.43 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.6% | R$1.46 Billion | R$5.18 Million | R$4.19 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 99.8% | R$1.66 Billion | R$3.73 Million | R$3.78 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 99.6% | R$1.77 Billion | R$7.44 Million | R$3.73 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 99.2% | R$1.41 Billion | R$11.49 Million | R$2.85 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 98.7% | R$1.21 Billion | R$16.14 Million | R$3.32 Billion | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2006 | 94.7% | R$68.58 Million | R$3.65 Million | R$3.61 Billion | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | R$108.23 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.07 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | R$87.45 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | R$247.32 Million | R$0.00 | R$2.06 Billion | — |