California Water Service Group (CWT) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.81x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($167.29 Million) in capital expenditures ($135.18 Million). See California Water Service Group free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
California Water Service Group Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2024)
This chart tracks California Water Service Group's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for California Water Service Group (1994–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for California Water Service Group from 1994 to 2024. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see how much is California Water Service Group worth.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.62x | $290.87 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 1.76x | $217.82 Million | $383.75 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2022 | 1.34x | $243.77 Million | $327.76 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2021 | 1.27x | $231.72 Million | $293.19 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 2.53x | $117.92 Million | $298.65 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.62x | $168.79 Million | $273.77 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 1.52x | $179.02 Million | $271.71 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2017 | 1.75x | $147.84 Million | $259.19 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2016 | 1.43x | $159.70 Million | $228.94 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2015 | 1.22x | $144.63 Million | $176.83 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2014 | 1.03x | $128.13 Million | $132.01 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.99x | $124.17 Million | $122.99 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.97x | $131.91 Million | $127.68 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 1.07x | $111.27 Million | $118.55 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2010 | 1.64x | $75.51 Million | $123.93 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2009 | 1.53x | $72.42 Million | $110.61 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2008 | 1.13x | $95.73 Million | $107.80 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2007 | 2.02x | $50.05 Million | $101.34 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2006 | 1.88x | $60.97 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | $86.26 Million | $94.52 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2004 | 1.24x | $55.41 Million | $68.57 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2003 | 1.67x | $44.43 Million | $74.25 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2002 | 2.64x | $33.41 Million | $88.36 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2001 | 1.61x | $38.59 Million | $62.05 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2000 | 1.07x | $34.63 Million | $37.16 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 1999 | 1.04x | $42.70 Million | $44.50 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1998 | 0.92x | $37.50 Million | $34.60 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1997 | 0.84x | $39.40 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 1.08x | $33.20 Million | $35.70 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $29.80 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1994 | 1.11x | $25.50 Million | $28.30 Million | — |