California Water Service Group (CWT) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.81x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($167.29 Million) in capital expenditures ($135.18 Million). See California Water Service Group (CWT) balance sheet quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
California Water Service Group Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2024)
This chart tracks California Water Service Group's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check CWT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for California Water Service Group (1994–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for California Water Service Group from 1994 to 2024. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see market cap of California Water Service Group.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.62x | $290.87 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 1.76x | $217.82 Million | $383.75 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2022 | 1.34x | $243.77 Million | $327.76 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2021 | 1.27x | $231.72 Million | $293.19 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 2.53x | $117.92 Million | $298.65 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.62x | $168.79 Million | $273.77 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 1.52x | $179.02 Million | $271.71 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2017 | 1.75x | $147.84 Million | $259.19 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2016 | 1.43x | $159.70 Million | $228.94 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2015 | 1.22x | $144.63 Million | $176.83 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2014 | 1.03x | $128.13 Million | $132.01 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.99x | $124.17 Million | $122.99 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.97x | $131.91 Million | $127.68 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 1.07x | $111.27 Million | $118.55 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2010 | 1.64x | $75.51 Million | $123.93 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2009 | 1.53x | $72.42 Million | $110.61 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2008 | 1.13x | $95.73 Million | $107.80 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2007 | 2.02x | $50.05 Million | $101.34 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2006 | 1.88x | $60.97 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | $86.26 Million | $94.52 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2004 | 1.24x | $55.41 Million | $68.57 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2003 | 1.67x | $44.43 Million | $74.25 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2002 | 2.64x | $33.41 Million | $88.36 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2001 | 1.61x | $38.59 Million | $62.05 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2000 | 1.07x | $34.63 Million | $37.16 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 1999 | 1.04x | $42.70 Million | $44.50 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1998 | 0.92x | $37.50 Million | $34.60 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1997 | 0.84x | $39.40 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 1.08x | $33.20 Million | $35.70 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $29.80 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1994 | 1.11x | $25.50 Million | $28.30 Million | — |