California Water Service Group Capital Reinvestment Ratio
California Water Service Group capital reinvestment ratio. California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 2.31x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 2% of its operating cash flow ($63.60 Million) in capital expenditures ($146.98 Million). Check total reinvestment intensity of California Water Service Group to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of California Water Service Group (1994–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of California Water Service Group from 1994 to 2025. This chart tracks California Water Service Group's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 32 annual periods. Also explore California Water Service Group net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
California Water Service Group Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
California Water Service Group capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CWT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.71x | $302.56 Million | $516.99 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 1.62x | $290.87 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 1.76x | $217.82 Million | $383.75 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2022 | 1.34x | $243.77 Million | $327.76 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2021 | 1.27x | $231.72 Million | $293.19 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 2.53x | $117.92 Million | $298.65 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.62x | $168.79 Million | $273.77 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 1.52x | $179.02 Million | $271.71 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2017 | 1.75x | $147.84 Million | $259.19 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2016 | 1.43x | $159.70 Million | $228.94 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2015 | 1.22x | $144.63 Million | $176.83 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2014 | 1.03x | $128.13 Million | $132.01 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.99x | $124.17 Million | $122.99 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.97x | $131.91 Million | $127.68 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 1.07x | $111.27 Million | $118.55 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2010 | 1.64x | $75.51 Million | $123.93 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2009 | 1.53x | $72.42 Million | $110.61 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2008 | 1.13x | $95.73 Million | $107.80 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2007 | 2.02x | $50.05 Million | $101.34 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2006 | 1.88x | $60.97 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | $86.26 Million | $94.52 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2004 | 1.24x | $55.41 Million | $68.57 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2003 | 1.67x | $44.43 Million | $74.25 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2002 | 2.64x | $33.41 Million | $88.36 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2001 | 1.61x | $38.59 Million | $62.05 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2000 | 1.07x | $34.63 Million | $37.16 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 1999 | 1.04x | $42.70 Million | $44.50 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1998 | 0.92x | $37.50 Million | $34.60 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1997 | 0.84x | $39.40 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 1.08x | $33.20 Million | $35.70 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $29.80 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1994 | 1.11x | $25.50 Million | $28.30 Million | — |