California Water Service Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
California Water Service Group cash flow-to-debt ratio. California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.14 Billion) in one year. Check California Water Service Group (CWT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of California Water Service Group (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of California Water Service Group from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for California Water Service Group across 32 annual periods. Check California Water Service Group (CWT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
California Water Service Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
California Water Service Group cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for California Water Service Group. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see California Water Service Group cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $302.56 Million | $3.98 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $290.87 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $217.82 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $243.77 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $231.72 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $117.92 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $168.79 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $179.02 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $147.84 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $159.70 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $144.63 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $128.13 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $124.17 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $131.91 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $111.27 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $75.51 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $72.42 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $95.73 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $50.05 Million | $795.32 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $60.97 Million | $783.24 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $86.26 Million | $699.53 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $55.41 Million | $651.77 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $44.43 Million | $625.04 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $33.41 Million | $597.89 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $38.59 Million | $510.12 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $34.63 Million | $464.30 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $42.70 Million | $406.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $37.50 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $39.40 Million | $363.70 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $33.20 Million | $354.70 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $29.80 Million | $334.50 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $25.50 Million | $316.30 Million | — |