California Water Service Group (CWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $167.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.82 Billion) in one year. Check CWT cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
California Water Service Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for California Water Service Group across 31 annual periods. Also explore CWT asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for California Water Service Group (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for California Water Service Group. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of California Water Service Group.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $290.87 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $217.82 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $243.77 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $231.72 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $117.92 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $168.79 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $179.02 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $147.84 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $159.70 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $144.63 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $128.13 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $124.17 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $131.91 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $111.27 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $75.51 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $72.42 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $95.73 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $50.05 Million | $795.32 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $60.97 Million | $783.24 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $86.26 Million | $699.53 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $55.41 Million | $651.77 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $44.43 Million | $625.04 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $33.41 Million | $597.89 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $38.59 Million | $510.12 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $34.63 Million | $464.30 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $42.70 Million | $406.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $37.50 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $39.40 Million | $363.70 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $33.20 Million | $354.70 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $29.80 Million | $334.50 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $25.50 Million | $316.30 Million | — |