California Water Service Group (CWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $167.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.82 Billion) in one year. See California Water Service Group (CWT) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
California Water Service Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for California Water Service Group across 31 annual periods. Also explore CWT year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for California Water Service Group (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for California Water Service Group. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is California Water Service Group worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $290.87 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $217.82 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $243.77 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $231.72 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $117.92 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $168.79 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $179.02 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $147.84 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $159.70 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $144.63 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $128.13 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $124.17 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $131.91 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $111.27 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $75.51 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $72.42 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $95.73 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $50.05 Million | $795.32 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $60.97 Million | $783.24 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $86.26 Million | $699.53 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $55.41 Million | $651.77 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $44.43 Million | $625.04 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $33.41 Million | $597.89 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $38.59 Million | $510.12 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $34.63 Million | $464.30 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $42.70 Million | $406.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $37.50 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $39.40 Million | $363.70 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $33.20 Million | $354.70 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $29.80 Million | $334.50 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $25.50 Million | $316.30 Million | — |