California Water Service Group (CWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.14 Billion) in one year. See CWT free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
California Water Service Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for California Water Service Group across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CWT cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for California Water Service Group (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for California Water Service Group. Check how high is California Water Service Group's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $302.56 Million | $3.98 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $290.87 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $217.82 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $243.77 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $231.72 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $117.92 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $168.79 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $179.02 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $147.84 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $159.70 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $144.63 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $128.13 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $124.17 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $131.91 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $111.27 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $75.51 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $72.42 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $95.73 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $50.05 Million | $795.32 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $60.97 Million | $783.24 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $86.26 Million | $699.53 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $55.41 Million | $651.77 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $44.43 Million | $625.04 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $33.41 Million | $597.89 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $38.59 Million | $510.12 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $34.63 Million | $464.30 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $42.70 Million | $406.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $37.50 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $39.40 Million | $363.70 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $33.20 Million | $354.70 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $29.80 Million | $334.50 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $25.50 Million | $316.30 Million | — |