California Water Service Group Cash Flow Quality Index
California Water Service Group cash flow quality index. California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.13x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $63.60 Million exceeds net income of $56.45 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial agility of California Water Service Group to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of California Water Service Group (1994–2025)
Cash flow quality index of California Water Service Group from 1994 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for California Water Service Group across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore California Water Service Group (CWT) debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
California Water Service Group Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1994–2025)
California Water Service Group cash flow quality index by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for California Water Service Group. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see California Water Service Group (CWT) cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.37x | $302.56 Million | $127.85 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2024 | 1.53x | $290.87 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2023 | 4.20x | $217.82 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2022 | 2.56x | $243.77 Million | $95.26 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2021 | 2.29x | $231.72 Million | $100.98 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2020 | 1.22x | $117.92 Million | $96.83 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 2.67x | $168.79 Million | $63.12 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2018 | 2.73x | $179.02 Million | $65.58 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2017 | 2.20x | $147.84 Million | $67.18 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2016 | 3.28x | $159.70 Million | $48.67 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 3.21x | $144.63 Million | $45.02 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2014 | 2.26x | $128.13 Million | $56.74 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2013 | 2.63x | $124.17 Million | $47.25 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2012 | 2.70x | $131.91 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2011 | 2.95x | $111.27 Million | $37.71 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2010 | 2.01x | $75.51 Million | $37.66 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2009 | 1.79x | $72.42 Million | $40.55 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2008 | 2.40x | $95.73 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2007 | 1.61x | $50.05 Million | $31.16 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2006 | 2.38x | $60.97 Million | $25.58 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2005 | 3.17x | $86.26 Million | $27.22 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | 2.13x | $55.41 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2003 | 2.29x | $44.43 Million | $19.42 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2002 | 1.75x | $33.41 Million | $19.07 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 2.58x | $38.59 Million | $14.96 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $34.63 Million | $19.96 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1999 | 2.15x | $42.70 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 2.04x | $37.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 1997 | 1.69x | $39.40 Million | $23.30 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1996 | 1.74x | $33.20 Million | $19.10 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1995 | 2.03x | $29.80 Million | $14.70 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1994 | 1.77x | $25.50 Million | $14.40 Million | — |