California Water Service Group (CWT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.74x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $167.29 Million exceeds net income of $61.12 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore CWT cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
California Water Service Group Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for California Water Service Group across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check California Water Service Group cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for California Water Service Group (1994–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for California Water Service Group. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see CWT market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.53x | $290.87 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2023 | 4.20x | $217.82 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2022 | 2.56x | $243.77 Million | $95.26 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2021 | 2.29x | $231.72 Million | $100.98 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2020 | 1.22x | $117.92 Million | $96.83 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 2.67x | $168.79 Million | $63.12 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2018 | 2.73x | $179.02 Million | $65.58 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2017 | 2.20x | $147.84 Million | $67.18 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2016 | 3.28x | $159.70 Million | $48.67 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 3.21x | $144.63 Million | $45.02 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2014 | 2.26x | $128.13 Million | $56.74 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2013 | 2.63x | $124.17 Million | $47.25 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2012 | 2.70x | $131.91 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2011 | 2.95x | $111.27 Million | $37.71 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2010 | 2.01x | $75.51 Million | $37.66 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2009 | 1.79x | $72.42 Million | $40.55 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2008 | 2.40x | $95.73 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2007 | 1.61x | $50.05 Million | $31.16 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2006 | 2.38x | $60.97 Million | $25.58 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2005 | 3.17x | $86.26 Million | $27.22 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | 2.13x | $55.41 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2003 | 2.29x | $44.43 Million | $19.42 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2002 | 1.75x | $33.41 Million | $19.07 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 2.58x | $38.59 Million | $14.96 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $34.63 Million | $19.96 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1999 | 2.15x | $42.70 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 2.04x | $37.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 1997 | 1.69x | $39.40 Million | $23.30 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1996 | 1.74x | $33.20 Million | $19.10 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1995 | 2.03x | $29.80 Million | $14.70 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1994 | 1.77x | $25.50 Million | $14.40 Million | — |