California Water Service Group (CWT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
California Water Service Group (CWT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.13x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $63.60 Million exceeds net income of $56.45 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how well can California Water Service Group service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
California Water Service Group Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for California Water Service Group across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CWT operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for California Water Service Group (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for California Water Service Group.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.37x | $302.56 Million | $127.85 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2024 | 1.53x | $290.87 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2023 | 4.20x | $217.82 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2022 | 2.56x | $243.77 Million | $95.26 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2021 | 2.29x | $231.72 Million | $100.98 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2020 | 1.22x | $117.92 Million | $96.83 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2019 | 2.67x | $168.79 Million | $63.12 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2018 | 2.73x | $179.02 Million | $65.58 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2017 | 2.20x | $147.84 Million | $67.18 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2016 | 3.28x | $159.70 Million | $48.67 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 3.21x | $144.63 Million | $45.02 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2014 | 2.26x | $128.13 Million | $56.74 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2013 | 2.63x | $124.17 Million | $47.25 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2012 | 2.70x | $131.91 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2011 | 2.95x | $111.27 Million | $37.71 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2010 | 2.01x | $75.51 Million | $37.66 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2009 | 1.79x | $72.42 Million | $40.55 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2008 | 2.40x | $95.73 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2007 | 1.61x | $50.05 Million | $31.16 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2006 | 2.38x | $60.97 Million | $25.58 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2005 | 3.17x | $86.26 Million | $27.22 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | 2.13x | $55.41 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2003 | 2.29x | $44.43 Million | $19.42 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2002 | 1.75x | $33.41 Million | $19.07 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 2.58x | $38.59 Million | $14.96 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $34.63 Million | $19.96 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1999 | 2.15x | $42.70 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1998 | 2.04x | $37.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 1997 | 1.69x | $39.40 Million | $23.30 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1996 | 1.74x | $33.20 Million | $19.10 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1995 | 2.03x | $29.80 Million | $14.70 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1994 | 1.77x | $25.50 Million | $14.40 Million | — |