Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (AUBN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (AUBN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.10x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $3.50 Million exceeds net income of $1.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Auburn National Bancorporation Inc operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Auburn National Bancorporation Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1996–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Auburn National Bancorporation Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (AUBN) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.70x | $12.35 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2024 | 1.69x | $10.81 Million | $6.40 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 2023 | 8.51x | $11.87 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +701.7% |
| 2022 | 1.06x | $10.98 Million | $10.35 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2021 | 1.53x | $12.32 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2020 | 1.31x | $9.73 Million | $7.45 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2019 | 1.11x | $10.85 Million | $9.74 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2018 | 1.37x | $12.14 Million | $8.83 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2017 | 1.20x | $9.40 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2016 | 1.29x | $10.49 Million | $8.15 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2015 | 1.38x | $10.85 Million | $7.86 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2014 | 1.41x | $10.53 Million | $7.45 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2013 | 1.93x | $13.72 Million | $7.12 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2012 | 2.23x | $15.06 Million | $6.76 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2011 | 2.54x | $14.09 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2010 | 2.22x | $11.88 Million | $5.35 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2009 | 1.80x | $4.32 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $6.02 Million | $6.64 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $6.68 Million | $6.92 Million | ▲ +1290.9% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-534.00K | $6.58 Million | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2005 | 1.22x | $7.88 Million | $6.47 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2004 | 1.91x | $12.41 Million | $6.51 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2003 | 1.46x | $7.91 Million | $5.42 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2002 | 2.15x | $10.86 Million | $5.05 Million | ▲ +360.3% |
| 2001 | -0.83x | $-3.78 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2000 | 1.81x | $5.46 Million | $3.01 Million | ▲ +275.3% |
| 1999 | 0.48x | $1.40 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -48.7% |
| 1998 | 0.94x | $3.20 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 1997 | 1.26x | $3.90 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1996 | 0.79x | $2.20 Million | $2.80 Million | — |