Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (AUBN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (AUBN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($928.54 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Auburn National Bancorporation Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Auburn National Bancorporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Auburn National Bancorporation Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Auburn National Bancorporation Inc. Check AUBN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $12.35 Million | $926.74 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $10.81 Million | $899.03 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $11.87 Million | $898.75 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $10.98 Million | $955.85 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $12.32 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $9.73 Million | $848.91 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $10.85 Million | $729.55 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $12.14 Million | $729.02 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $9.40 Million | $766.48 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $10.49 Million | $749.77 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $10.85 Million | $737.24 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $10.53 Million | $713.43 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $13.72 Million | $686.86 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $15.06 Million | $689.68 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $14.09 Million | $710.80 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $11.88 Million | $707.46 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.32 Million | $717.20 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $6.02 Million | $688.84 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $6.68 Million | $635.64 Million | ▲ +1254.8% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-534.00K | $586.71 Million | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $7.88 Million | $564.20 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $12.41 Million | $546.66 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $7.91 Million | $549.71 Million | ▼ -38.4% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $10.86 Million | $465.44 Million | ▲ +370.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-3.78 Million | $438.49 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $5.46 Million | $372.88 Million | ▲ +265.2% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $1.40 Million | $349.10 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.20 Million | $279.00 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $3.90 Million | $238.00 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.20 Million | $235.00 Million | — |