Hooker Furniture Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Hooker Furniture Corporation cash flow quality index. Hooker Furniture Corporation (HOFT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 5.77x as of July 2026. Operating cash flow of $9.63 Million exceeds net income of $1.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See Hooker Furniture Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Hooker Furniture Corporation (1999–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Hooker Furniture Corporation from 1999 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Hooker Furniture Corporation across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore Hooker Furniture Corporation (HOFT) cash flow to debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Hooker Furniture Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1999–2024)
Hooker Furniture Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Hooker Furniture Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HOFT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5.80x | $55.47 Million | $9.56 Million | ▲ +254.1% |
| 2022 | 1.64x | $19.21 Million | $11.72 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 2.43x | $41.43 Million | $17.08 Million | ▲ +900.8% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $9.66 Million | $39.87 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $27.75 Million | $28.56 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2017 | 1.24x | $31.24 Million | $25.29 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2016 | 1.42x | $23.04 Million | $16.18 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2015 | 1.81x | $22.77 Million | $12.58 Million | ▲ +152.0% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $5.70 Million | $7.93 Million | ▲ +285.9% |
| 2013 | -0.39x | $-3.33 Million | $8.63 Million | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2012 | 6.38x | $32.28 Million | $5.06 Million | ▲ +228.9% |
| 2011 | -4.95x | $-16.04 Million | $3.24 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | 12.44x | $37.42 Million | $3.01 Million | ▲ +2204.9% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $3.73 Million | $6.91 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2008 | 2.22x | $43.66 Million | $19.66 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2007 | 1.58x | $22.33 Million | $14.14 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2006 | 1.57x | $19.62 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +284.1% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | $7.45 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -85.7% |
| 2004 | 2.86x | $42.11 Million | $14.71 Million | ▲ +673.6% |
| 2003 | 0.37x | $5.70 Million | $15.39 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2002 | 3.14x | $20.46 Million | $6.51 Million | ▲ +186.2% |
| 2001 | 1.10x | $16.38 Million | $14.91 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2000 | 0.93x | $13.27 Million | $14.29 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 1999 | 1.40x | $15.13 Million | $10.79 Million | — |