Hooker Furniture Corporation (HOFT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hooker Furniture Corporation (HOFT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $14.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($54.12 Million) in one year. See HOFT financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hooker Furniture Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hooker Furniture Corporation across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Hooker Furniture Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hooker Furniture Corporation (1999–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hooker Furniture Corporation. Check HOFT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.36x | $20.37 Million | $56.65 Million | ▲ +271.2% |
| 2025 | -0.21x | $-23.02 Million | $109.56 Million | ▼ -144.5% |
| 2024 | 0.47x | $55.47 Million | $117.61 Million | ▲ +416.4% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | $-21.72 Million | $145.69 Million | ▼ -188.0% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | $19.21 Million | $113.43 Million | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | $68.26 Million | $94.77 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $41.43 Million | $119.59 Million | ▲ +282.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $9.66 Million | $106.54 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $27.75 Million | $120.29 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $31.24 Million | $120.77 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $23.04 Million | $25.59 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2015 | 0.82x | $22.77 Million | $27.84 Million | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | $5.70 Million | $19.36 Million | ▲ +318.7% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-3.33 Million | $24.78 Million | ▼ -109.2% |
| 2012 | 1.46x | $32.28 Million | $22.06 Million | ▲ +315.7% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | $-16.04 Million | $23.64 Million | ▼ -139.0% |
| 2010 | 1.74x | $37.42 Million | $21.51 Million | ▲ +1008.3% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $3.73 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2008 | 1.27x | $43.66 Million | $34.41 Million | ▲ +120.3% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $22.33 Million | $38.76 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $19.62 Million | $41.49 Million | ▲ +232.3% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $7.45 Million | $52.33 Million | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2004 | 0.83x | $42.11 Million | $50.88 Million | ▲ +609.6% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $5.70 Million | $48.84 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $20.46 Million | $52.95 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $16.38 Million | $57.97 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $13.27 Million | $31.19 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1999 | 0.41x | $15.13 Million | $37.33 Million | — |