Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.06x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $604.99 Million exceeds net income of $569.49 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore cash flow conversion of Monster Beverage Corp to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Monster Beverage Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1993–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Monster Beverage Corp across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Monster Beverage Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Monster Beverage Corp (1993–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Monster Beverage Corp. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see MNST market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.10x | $2.10 Billion | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2024 | 1.28x | $1.93 Billion | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2023 | 1.05x | $1.72 Billion | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2022 | 0.74x | $887.70 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.84x | $1.16 Billion | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2020 | 0.97x | $1.36 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2019 | 1.01x | $1.11 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | $1.16 Billion | $993.00 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2017 | 1.20x | $987.73 Million | $820.68 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2016 | 0.98x | $701.36 Million | $712.68 Million | ▲ +158.7% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $207.99 Million | $546.73 Million | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | $585.57 Million | $483.19 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 1.01x | $342.03 Million | $338.66 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2012 | 0.85x | $287.68 Million | $340.02 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2011 | 1.17x | $333.83 Million | $286.22 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $229.04 Million | $212.03 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2009 | 0.75x | $156.19 Million | $208.72 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2008 | 1.85x | $199.50 Million | $108.03 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2007 | 0.91x | $135.45 Million | $149.41 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2006 | 0.78x | $76.41 Million | $97.95 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | 0.87x | $54.65 Million | $62.78 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | $20.05 Million | $20.39 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2003 | 0.92x | $5.48 Million | $5.93 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2002 | 0.90x | $2.73 Million | $3.03 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2001 | 1.72x | $5.20 Million | $3.02 Million | ▲ +700.8% |
| 2000 | -0.29x | $-1.12 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -199.3% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | $1.30 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 1998 | 1.22x | $4.40 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +22.2% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $1.30 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1996 | 2.00x | $800.00K | $400.00K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 1993 | 1.33x | $800.00K | $600.00K | — |