Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $509.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.02 Billion) in one year. See Monster Beverage Corp leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Monster Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Monster Beverage Corp across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Monster Beverage Corp cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Monster Beverage Corp (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Monster Beverage Corp. Check Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $2.10 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $1.93 Billion | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $1.72 Billion | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2022 | 0.70x | $887.70 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2021 | 0.93x | $1.16 Billion | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2020 | 1.31x | $1.36 Billion | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2019 | 1.14x | $1.11 Billion | $979.07 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2018 | 1.27x | $1.16 Billion | $915.99 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2017 | 1.10x | $987.73 Million | $895.80 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2016 | 0.85x | $701.36 Million | $823.76 Million | ▲ +211.9% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $207.99 Million | $761.87 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2014 | 1.38x | $585.57 Million | $423.73 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2013 | 0.80x | $342.03 Million | $428.23 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $287.68 Million | $398.93 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.87x | $333.83 Million | $383.24 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $229.04 Million | $253.73 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2009 | 0.73x | $156.19 Million | $215.12 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2008 | 0.61x | $199.50 Million | $325.52 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2007 | 1.11x | $135.45 Million | $122.44 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2006 | 0.92x | $76.41 Million | $83.29 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2005 | 1.42x | $54.65 Million | $38.38 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2004 | 0.85x | $20.05 Million | $23.45 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $5.48 Million | $12.95 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $2.73 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $5.20 Million | $13.23 Million | ▲ +684.6% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-1.12 Million | $16.69 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $4.40 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +168.4% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +71.9% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $800.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +149.9% |
| 1995 | -0.22x | $-2.00 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-900.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -195.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.70 Million | ▲ +553.7% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.60 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | — |