Monster Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Monster Beverage Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $509.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.02 Billion) in one year. Check Monster Beverage Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Monster Beverage Corp (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Monster Beverage Corp from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Monster Beverage Corp across 35 annual periods. Check Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Monster Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Monster Beverage Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Monster Beverage Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Monster Beverage Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $2.10 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $1.93 Billion | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $1.72 Billion | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2022 | 0.70x | $887.70 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2021 | 0.93x | $1.16 Billion | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2020 | 1.31x | $1.36 Billion | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2019 | 1.14x | $1.11 Billion | $979.07 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2018 | 1.27x | $1.16 Billion | $915.99 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2017 | 1.10x | $987.73 Million | $895.80 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2016 | 0.85x | $701.36 Million | $823.76 Million | ▲ +211.9% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $207.99 Million | $761.87 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2014 | 1.38x | $585.57 Million | $423.73 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2013 | 0.80x | $342.03 Million | $428.23 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $287.68 Million | $398.93 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.87x | $333.83 Million | $383.24 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $229.04 Million | $253.73 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2009 | 0.73x | $156.19 Million | $215.12 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2008 | 0.61x | $199.50 Million | $325.52 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2007 | 1.11x | $135.45 Million | $122.44 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2006 | 0.92x | $76.41 Million | $83.29 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2005 | 1.42x | $54.65 Million | $38.38 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2004 | 0.85x | $20.05 Million | $23.45 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $5.48 Million | $12.95 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $2.73 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $5.20 Million | $13.23 Million | ▲ +684.6% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-1.12 Million | $16.69 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $4.40 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +168.4% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +71.9% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $800.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +149.9% |
| 1995 | -0.22x | $-2.00 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-900.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -195.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.70 Million | ▲ +553.7% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.60 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | — |