Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.29x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $604.99 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.12 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Monster Beverage Corp's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Monster Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Monster Beverage Corp across 35 annual periods. Also explore MNST asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Monster Beverage Corp (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Monster Beverage Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Monster Beverage Corp stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $2.10 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $1.93 Billion | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $1.72 Billion | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2022 | 0.70x | $887.70 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2021 | 0.93x | $1.16 Billion | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2020 | 1.31x | $1.36 Billion | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2019 | 1.14x | $1.11 Billion | $979.07 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2018 | 1.27x | $1.16 Billion | $915.99 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2017 | 1.10x | $987.73 Million | $895.80 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2016 | 0.85x | $701.36 Million | $823.76 Million | ▲ +211.9% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $207.99 Million | $761.87 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2014 | 1.38x | $585.57 Million | $423.73 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2013 | 0.80x | $342.03 Million | $428.23 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $287.68 Million | $398.93 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.87x | $333.83 Million | $383.24 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $229.04 Million | $253.73 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2009 | 0.73x | $156.19 Million | $215.12 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2008 | 0.61x | $199.50 Million | $325.52 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2007 | 1.11x | $135.45 Million | $122.44 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2006 | 0.92x | $76.41 Million | $83.29 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2005 | 1.42x | $54.65 Million | $38.38 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2004 | 0.85x | $20.05 Million | $23.45 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $5.48 Million | $12.95 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $2.73 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $5.20 Million | $13.23 Million | ▲ +684.6% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-1.12 Million | $16.69 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $4.40 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +168.4% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +71.9% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $800.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +149.9% |
| 1995 | -0.22x | $-2.00 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-900.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -195.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.70 Million | ▲ +553.7% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.60 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | — |