Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Cash Flow Quality Index
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares cash flow quality index. Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.67x as of June 2025. Operating cash flow of $437.48K exceeds net income of $261.31K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Neo-Concept International Group Holdings cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (2002–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares from 2002 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares across 20 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See debt-free asset ratio of Neo-Concept International Group Holdings to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (2002–2024)
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares cash flow quality index by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Neo-Concept International Group Holdings.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $428.24K | $8.06 Million | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2023 | -11.15x | $-49.23 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -223.4% |
| 2022 | -3.45x | $-42.76 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -283.0% |
| 2021 | 1.88x | $10.27 Million | $5.45 Million | ▲ +504.8% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $37.59 Million | $120.64 Million | ▼ -77.6% |
| 2017 | 1.39x | $104.23 Million | $74.95 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2016 | 1.89x | $110.03 Million | $58.10 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2015 | 1.38x | $83.08 Million | $60.34 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2013 | 2.29x | $119.77 Million | $52.19 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2012 | 1.65x | $75.96 Million | $46.17 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2011 | 2.71x | $111.37 Million | $41.13 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2010 | 1.74x | $41.77 Million | $24.06 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2009 | 3.53x | $77.49 Million | $21.95 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2008 | 2.29x | $91.70 Million | $40.06 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2007 | 2.75x | $91.84 Million | $33.40 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2006 | 1.66x | $87.91 Million | $52.97 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $58.40 Million | $49.86 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2004 | 1.79x | $72.24 Million | $40.38 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2003 | 3.05x | $57.05 Million | $18.71 Million | ▲ +219.4% |
| 2002 | 0.95x | $8.46 Million | $8.86 Million | — |