Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 78.9% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($12.30 Million) from net assets ($58.18 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is Neo-Concept International Group Holdings's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 78.9%, reflecting net assets of $58.18 Million with intangible assets of $12.30 Million USD. See Neo-Concept International Group Holdings defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares from 2000 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see NCI market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 76.2% | $56.83 Million | $13.54 Million | $135.65 Million | ▼ -21.8 pp |
| 2018 | 98.0% | $708.56 Million | $14.17 Million | $917.55 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 96.9% | $687.33 Million | $21.05 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2016 | 95.5% | $634.48 Million | $28.73 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2015 | 93.6% | $593.54 Million | $38.16 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2014 | 95.1% | $542.59 Million | $26.50 Million | $903.49 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | $597.08 Million | $10.78 Million | $904.20 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 97.1% | $559.74 Million | $16.12 Million | $954.45 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 96.7% | $513.68 Million | $16.82 Million | $875.20 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.0% | $460.72 Million | $23.19 Million | $869.03 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2009 | 92.5% | $405.15 Million | $30.35 Million | $806.61 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2008 | 89.1% | $348.23 Million | $38.11 Million | $774.86 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $335.82 Million | $57.76 Million | $771.77 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2006 | 91.7% | $463.31 Million | $38.42 Million | $629.09 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 94.7% | $382.57 Million | $20.42 Million | $540.98 Million | ▲ +72.6 pp |
| 2004 | 22.1% | $288.45 Million | $224.84 Million | $418.58 Million | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2003 | 40.6% | $188.76 Million | $112.08 Million | $255.32 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2002 | 32.5% | $144.29 Million | $97.37 Million | $201.20 Million | ▼ -35.9 pp |
| 2001 | 68.4% | $112.11 Million | $35.45 Million | $158.83 Million | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2000 | 76.2% | $115.72 Million | $27.52 Million | $163.48 Million | — |