Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 78.9% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($12.30 Million) from net assets ($58.18 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore NCI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 78.9%, reflecting net assets of $58.18 Million with intangible assets of $12.30 Million USD. Check Neo-Concept International Group Holdings strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares from 2000 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Neo-Concept International Group Holdings worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 76.2% | $56.83 Million | $13.54 Million | $135.65 Million | ▼ -21.8 pp |
| 2018 | 98.0% | $708.56 Million | $14.17 Million | $917.55 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 96.9% | $687.33 Million | $21.05 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2016 | 95.5% | $634.48 Million | $28.73 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2015 | 93.6% | $593.54 Million | $38.16 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2014 | 95.1% | $542.59 Million | $26.50 Million | $903.49 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | $597.08 Million | $10.78 Million | $904.20 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 97.1% | $559.74 Million | $16.12 Million | $954.45 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 96.7% | $513.68 Million | $16.82 Million | $875.20 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.0% | $460.72 Million | $23.19 Million | $869.03 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2009 | 92.5% | $405.15 Million | $30.35 Million | $806.61 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2008 | 89.1% | $348.23 Million | $38.11 Million | $774.86 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $335.82 Million | $57.76 Million | $771.77 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2006 | 91.7% | $463.31 Million | $38.42 Million | $629.09 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 94.7% | $382.57 Million | $20.42 Million | $540.98 Million | ▲ +72.6 pp |
| 2004 | 22.1% | $288.45 Million | $224.84 Million | $418.58 Million | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2003 | 40.6% | $188.76 Million | $112.08 Million | $255.32 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2002 | 32.5% | $144.29 Million | $97.37 Million | $201.20 Million | ▼ -35.9 pp |
| 2001 | 68.4% | $112.11 Million | $35.45 Million | $158.83 Million | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2000 | 76.2% | $115.72 Million | $27.52 Million | $163.48 Million | — |