Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 0.6% as of June 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $- plus long-term investments of $352.07K) total $352.07K, measured against net assets of $58.18 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check Neo-Concept International Group Holdings asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2018)
This chart shows how Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2000 to 2018. As of June 2025, the index stands at 0.6%, representing strategic assets of $352.07K against net assets of $58.18 Million USD. See Neo-Concept International Group Holdings financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (2000–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares from 2000 to 2018, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Neo-Concept International Group Holdings market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 8.9% | $63.02 Million | $63.02 Million | $- | $708.56 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2017 | 10.4% | $71.43 Million | $71.43 Million | $- | $687.33 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2016 | 13.1% | $82.95 Million | $82.95 Million | $- | $634.48 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 12.9% | $76.72 Million | $76.72 Million | $- | $593.54 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2014 | 11.2% | $60.62 Million | $60.62 Million | $- | $542.59 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2013 | 7.4% | $44.34 Million | $44.34 Million | $- | $597.08 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 8.1% | $45.34 Million | $45.34 Million | $- | $559.74 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 8.0% | $41.14 Million | $41.14 Million | $- | $513.68 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 8.4% | $38.90 Million | $38.90 Million | $- | $460.72 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2009 | 10.6% | $42.98 Million | $42.98 Million | $- | $405.15 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2008 | 13.0% | $45.15 Million | $45.15 Million | $- | $348.23 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2007 | 16.3% | $54.69 Million | $54.69 Million | $- | $335.82 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2006 | 11.0% | $51.16 Million | $51.16 Million | $- | $463.31 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 11.1% | $42.32 Million | $42.32 Million | $- | $382.57 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2004 | 9.5% | $27.38 Million | $27.38 Million | $- | $288.45 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2003 | 10.6% | $19.96 Million | $19.96 Million | $- | $188.76 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2002 | 12.6% | $18.12 Million | $18.12 Million | $- | $144.29 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2001 | 18.4% | $20.65 Million | $20.65 Million | $- | $112.11 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2000 | 16.7% | $19.33 Million | $19.33 Million | $- | $115.72 Million | — |