Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $437.48K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($79.58 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Neo-Concept International Group Holdings generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares across 23 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Neo-Concept International Group Holdings growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Neo-Concept International Group Holdings worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $428.24K | $78.82 Million | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2023 | -0.53x | $-49.23 Million | $93.00 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2022 | -0.42x | $-42.76 Million | $102.55 Million | ▼ -570.2% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $10.27 Million | $115.82 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $6.28 Million | $142.71 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $37.59 Million | $208.98 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $104.23 Million | $392.93 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $110.03 Million | $420.32 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $83.08 Million | $422.36 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $90.10 Million | $360.90 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | $119.77 Million | $307.12 Million | ▲ +102.6% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $75.96 Million | $394.71 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $111.37 Million | $361.52 Million | ▲ +201.1% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $41.77 Million | $408.31 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $77.49 Million | $401.45 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $91.70 Million | $426.63 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2007 | 0.21x | $91.84 Million | $435.94 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | $87.91 Million | $165.78 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $58.40 Million | $158.41 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $72.24 Million | $130.13 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2003 | 0.86x | $57.05 Million | $66.56 Million | ▲ +476.5% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $8.46 Million | $56.91 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | $11.44 Million | $46.72 Million | — |