Veris Residential Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
Veris Residential Inc cash flow quality index. Veris Residential Inc (VRE) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.20x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $14.56 Million is below net income of $71.77 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See financial flexibility index of Veris Residential Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Veris Residential Inc (1994–2019)
Cash flow quality index of Veris Residential Inc from 1994 to 2019. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Veris Residential Inc across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore VRE debt coverage from operations to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Veris Residential Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1994–2019)
Veris Residential Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1994 to 2019. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Veris Residential Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Veris Residential Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.52x | $131.84 Million | $252.55 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2018 | 1.57x | $167.07 Million | $106.40 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2017 | 5.82x | $196.14 Million | $33.72 Million | ▲ +657.1% |
| 2016 | 0.77x | $100.11 Million | $130.29 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2014 | 5.07x | $159.25 Million | $31.39 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2012 | 5.29x | $244.71 Million | $46.27 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2011 | 3.10x | $252.06 Million | $81.39 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2010 | 3.52x | $223.04 Million | $63.44 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2009 | 4.62x | $294.69 Million | $63.73 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2008 | 5.14x | $275.99 Million | $53.73 Million | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2007 | 2.35x | $259.98 Million | $110.47 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2006 | 1.63x | $235.93 Million | $144.67 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2005 | 2.54x | $242.93 Million | $95.49 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2004 | 2.33x | $238.44 Million | $102.45 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2003 | 1.54x | $220.78 Million | $143.05 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2002 | 1.58x | $220.14 Million | $139.72 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2001 | 2.02x | $265.88 Million | $131.66 Million | ▲ +107.3% |
| 2000 | 0.97x | $180.53 Million | $185.34 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 1999 | 2.03x | $243.64 Million | $119.74 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1998 | 1.76x | $208.76 Million | $118.95 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 1997 | 69.85x | $98.14 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +4665.5% |
| 1996 | 1.47x | $46.82 Million | $31.94 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 1995 | 2.09x | $28.40 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1994 | 1.64x | $6.40 Million | $3.90 Million | — |