Veris Residential Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Veris Residential Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Veris Residential Inc (VRE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $14.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.51 Billion) in one year. Check VRE operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Veris Residential Inc (1994–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Veris Residential Inc from 1994 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Veris Residential Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Veris Residential Inc (VRE) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Veris Residential Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2024)
Veris Residential Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Veris Residential Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see VRE cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.04x | $64.75 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $57.61 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $66.45 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $56.12 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $85.42 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $131.84 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $167.07 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $196.14 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $100.11 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $169.46 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $159.25 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $198.69 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $244.71 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $252.06 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $223.04 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $294.69 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $275.99 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $259.98 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $235.93 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $242.93 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $238.44 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $220.78 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $220.14 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $265.88 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $180.53 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -31.1% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $243.64 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $208.76 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +47.2% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $98.14 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -40.9% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $46.82 Million | $297.99 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $28.40 Million | $135.50 Million | ▲ +152.2% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $6.40 Million | $77.00 Million | — |