Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 10.65x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $1.15 Billion exceeds net income of $108.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Whirlpool Corporation to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Whirlpool Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Whirlpool Corporation across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Whirlpool Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Whirlpool Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Whirlpool Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see WHR company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.52x | $481.00 Million | $317.00 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2023 | 1.90x | $915.00 Million | $481.00 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2021 | 1.20x | $2.18 Billion | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2020 | 1.40x | $1.50 Billion | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2019 | 1.03x | $1.23 Billion | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2017 | 3.61x | $1.26 Billion | $350.00 Million | ▲ +166.6% |
| 2016 | 1.35x | $1.20 Billion | $888.00 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2015 | 1.56x | $1.23 Billion | $783.00 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2014 | 2.28x | $1.48 Billion | $650.00 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2013 | 1.53x | $1.26 Billion | $827.00 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2012 | 1.74x | $696.00 Million | $401.00 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2011 | 1.36x | $530.00 Million | $390.00 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | 1.74x | $1.08 Billion | $619.00 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2009 | 4.73x | $1.55 Billion | $328.00 Million | ▲ +504.1% |
| 2008 | 0.78x | $327.00 Million | $418.00 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2007 | 1.44x | $933.00 Million | $647.00 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2006 | 1.83x | $888.00 Million | $486.00 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2005 | 2.09x | $881.00 Million | $422.00 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2004 | 1.96x | $794.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2003 | 1.80x | $744.00 Million | $414.00 Million | ▼ -96.3% |
| 2001 | 48.76x | $1.02 Billion | $21.00 Million | ▲ +3921.5% |
| 2000 | 1.21x | $445.00 Million | $367.00 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 1999 | 2.31x | $801.00 Million | $347.00 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 1998 | 2.35x | $763.00 Million | $325.00 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 1996 | 3.49x | $545.00 Million | $156.00 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 1995 | 1.80x | $377.00 Million | $209.00 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 1994 | 2.84x | $449.00 Million | $158.00 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 1993 | 2.72x | $629.00 Million | $231.00 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1992 | 2.82x | $578.00 Million | $205.00 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 1991 | 4.81x | $817.00 Million | $170.00 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 1990 | 7.33x | $528.00 Million | $72.00 Million | — |