Nam Sung (004270) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.01x

Nam Sung (004270) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-914.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩172.93 Billion) in one year. See Nam Sung free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-914.18 Million
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩172.93 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Nam Sung Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Nam Sung across 18 annual periods. Also explore 004270 year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nam Sung (2000–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nam Sung. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Nam Sung.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.03x ₩-5.37 Billion ₩172.93 Billion ▼ -63.2%
2024 -0.02x ₩-3.21 Billion ₩168.67 Billion ▲ +27.5%
2023 -0.03x ₩-3.93 Billion ₩150.00 Billion ▲ +37.6%
2022 -0.04x ₩-6.38 Billion ₩151.65 Billion ▼ -417.6%
2021 -0.01x ₩-1.38 Billion ₩170.18 Billion ▼ -144.5%
2020 0.02x ₩2.15 Billion ₩117.80 Billion ▲ +128.6%
2019 -0.06x ₩-7.59 Billion ₩118.87 Billion ▼ -700.7%
2018 0.01x ₩1.30 Billion ₩122.32 Billion ▼ -82.2%
2017 0.06x ₩6.94 Billion ₩116.04 Billion ▲ +11.8%
2016 0.05x ₩7.01 Billion ₩131.15 Billion ▲ +190.2%
2015 -0.06x ₩-7.75 Billion ₩130.75 Billion ▼ -10.1%
2014 -0.05x ₩-6.62 Billion ₩122.87 Billion ▼ -140.1%
2013 0.13x ₩16.38 Billion ₩121.89 Billion ▲ +475.6%
2011 0.02x ₩3.19 Billion ₩136.51 Billion ▼ -36.9%
2006 0.04x ₩4.28 Billion ₩115.66 Billion ▲ +3.3%
2005 0.04x ₩5.04 Billion ₩140.58 Billion ▲ +55.4%
2002 0.02x ₩1.84 Billion ₩79.94 Billion ▼ -52.1%
2000 0.05x ₩3.21 Billion ₩66.84 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.