Jayjun Co Ltd (025620) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.03x

Jayjun Co Ltd (025620) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-1.05 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩34.82 Billion) in one year. See Jayjun Co Ltd (025620) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-1.05 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩34.82 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Jayjun Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jayjun Co Ltd across 17 annual periods. Also explore Jayjun Co Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jayjun Co Ltd (2001–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jayjun Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 025620 market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.19x ₩-6.71 Billion ₩34.82 Billion ▲ +74.1%
2024 -0.75x ₩-6.91 Billion ₩9.28 Billion ▲ +36.8%
2023 -1.18x ₩-9.86 Billion ₩8.37 Billion ▼ -61.0%
2022 -0.73x ₩-4.98 Billion ₩6.81 Billion ▼ -314.1%
2021 -0.18x ₩-3.49 Billion ₩19.75 Billion ▲ +1.3%
2020 -0.18x ₩-5.02 Billion ₩28.06 Billion ▼ -461.2%
2019 0.05x ₩3.50 Billion ₩70.64 Billion ▲ +113.9%
2018 -0.36x ₩-31.56 Billion ₩88.30 Billion ▲ +55.2%
2017 -0.80x ₩-20.60 Billion ₩25.81 Billion ▼ -425.5%
2016 0.25x ₩7.08 Billion ₩28.89 Billion ▲ +129.8%
2015 -0.82x ₩-16.24 Billion ₩19.70 Billion ▼ -64.1%
2014 -0.50x ₩-5.33 Billion ₩10.61 Billion ▼ -2707.6%
2013 -0.02x ₩-1.46 Billion ₩81.86 Billion ▼ -104.3%
2005 0.42x ₩27.41 Billion ₩65.99 Billion ▲ +430.0%
2004 0.08x ₩3.85 Billion ₩49.16 Billion ▲ +1135.9%
2003 0.01x ₩315.76 Million ₩49.79 Billion ▼ -89.5%
2001 0.06x ₩13.80 Billion ₩229.24 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.