Daesung Energy (117580) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.04x

Daesung Energy (117580) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-10.52 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩298.71 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Daesung Energy to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-10.52 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩298.71 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Daesung Energy Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Daesung Energy across 18 annual periods. Also explore 117580 asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Daesung Energy (2007–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Daesung Energy. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Daesung Energy.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.10x ₩45.38 Billion ₩468.52 Billion ▲ +132.4%
2023 0.04x ₩20.15 Billion ₩483.59 Billion ▼ -59.1%
2022 0.10x ₩53.04 Billion ₩520.70 Billion ▼ -20.9%
2021 0.13x ₩54.74 Billion ₩425.14 Billion ▲ +40.3%
2020 0.09x ₩35.59 Billion ₩387.71 Billion ▼ -24.6%
2019 0.12x ₩47.58 Billion ₩390.72 Billion ▼ -14.6%
2018 0.14x ₩50.18 Billion ₩351.86 Billion ▲ +2.8%
2017 0.14x ₩47.93 Billion ₩345.62 Billion ▼ -11.0%
2016 0.16x ₩51.44 Billion ₩330.03 Billion ▲ +51.6%
2015 0.10x ₩35.19 Billion ₩342.25 Billion ▼ -1.2%
2014 0.10x ₩42.18 Billion ₩405.07 Billion ▲ +2.7%
2013 0.10x ₩38.40 Billion ₩378.66 Billion ▲ +8.5%
2012 0.09x ₩35.17 Billion ₩376.11 Billion ▼ -26.3%
2011 0.13x ₩40.31 Billion ₩317.71 Billion ▼ -18.3%
2010 0.16x ₩47.37 Billion ₩304.99 Billion ▼ -4.6%
2009 0.16x ₩47.37 Billion ₩290.93 Billion ▲ +53.2%
2008 0.11x ₩35.17 Billion ₩330.94 Billion ▼ -4.4%
2007 0.11x ₩35.17 Billion ₩316.26 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.