Panagene Inc (046210) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.00x

Panagene Inc (046210) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩46.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩24.65 Billion) in one year. See Panagene Inc (046210) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩46.17 Million
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩24.65 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Panagene Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2006–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Panagene Inc across 17 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Panagene Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Panagene Inc (2006–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Panagene Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Panagene Inc market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.01x ₩346.54 Million ₩33.57 Billion ▲ +681.3%
2023 0.00x ₩36.13 Million ₩27.34 Billion ▼ -99.9%
2022 1.13x ₩3.36 Billion ₩2.98 Billion ▼ -61.3%
2021 2.91x ₩6.01 Billion ₩2.07 Billion ▲ +48.6%
2020 1.96x ₩4.23 Billion ₩2.16 Billion ▲ +195.9%
2019 0.66x ₩1.05 Billion ₩1.58 Billion ▲ +404.7%
2018 0.13x ₩1.02 Billion ₩7.77 Billion ▲ +149.9%
2017 -0.26x ₩-2.12 Billion ₩8.06 Billion ▼ -179.2%
2016 -0.09x ₩-1.12 Billion ₩11.92 Billion ▼ -333.4%
2015 -0.02x ₩-363.21 Million ₩16.73 Billion ▼ -107.5%
2012 0.29x ₩4.81 Billion ₩16.58 Billion ▲ +308.8%
2011 -0.14x ₩-3.68 Billion ₩26.48 Billion ▼ -60.0%
2010 -0.09x ₩-1.88 Billion ₩21.65 Billion ▲ +69.8%
2009 -0.29x ₩-4.31 Billion ₩14.97 Billion ▼ -567.8%
2008 0.06x ₩1.50 Billion ₩24.39 Billion ▼ -52.6%
2007 0.13x ₩2.15 Billion ₩16.54 Billion ▲ +162.7%
2006 0.05x ₩1.37 Billion ₩27.73 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.