Enterprise Financial Services (EFSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enterprise Financial Services (EFSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $49.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.42 Billion) in one year. See Enterprise Financial Services financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enterprise Financial Services Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enterprise Financial Services across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Enterprise Financial Services generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enterprise Financial Services (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enterprise Financial Services. Check EFSC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $247.40 Million | $13.77 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $268.24 Million | $12.80 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $216.64 Million | $11.53 Billion | ▼ -93.5% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $160.57 Million | $558.76 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $135.51 Million | $554.72 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $92.46 Million | $628.84 Million | ▲ +581.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $108.81 Million | $5.04 Billion | ▲ +123.4% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $45.79 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $82.52 Million | $3.69 Billion | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $47.19 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $31.49 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $29.31 Million | $2.89 Billion | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $37.37 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $27.13 Million | $3.14 Billion | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $49.22 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $28.75 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $20.29 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $25.22 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $17.76 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $16.16 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $15.08 Million | $987.22 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $15.98 Million | $842.34 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $11.42 Million | $802.98 Million | ▲ +833.7% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-1.42 Million | $732.35 Million | ▼ -115.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $8.03 Million | $645.58 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $9.50 Million | $568.10 Million | ▲ +436.6% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $-1.72 Million | $346.06 Million | ▼ -258.4% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $832.02K | $265.30 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.08 Million | $169.83 Million | — |