Harte Hanks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Harte Hanks Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($72.71 Million) in one year. Check HHS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Harte Hanks Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Harte Hanks Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Harte Hanks Inc across 34 annual periods. Check HHS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Harte Hanks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Harte Hanks Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Harte Hanks Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Harte Hanks Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-1.74 Million | $71.30 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-2.99 Million | $80.09 Million | ▼ -139.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $10.48 Million | $111.22 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $28.79 Million | $101.18 Million | ▲ +2083.0% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.76 Million | $122.85 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-7.84 Million | $162.90 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $12.10 Million | $155.43 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-9.18 Million | $134.64 Million | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-30.80 Million | $165.45 Million | ▼ -368.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $14.59 Million | $210.78 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $30.94 Million | $274.31 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $25.56 Million | $320.52 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $59.57 Million | $336.48 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $76.32 Million | $378.05 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $60.66 Million | $486.16 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $95.38 Million | $489.06 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $114.02 Million | $506.51 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $116.70 Million | $557.19 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $143.22 Million | $543.41 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $146.37 Million | $475.81 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $145.41 Million | $328.32 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $153.32 Million | $256.55 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $124.06 Million | $203.53 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $141.64 Million | $204.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2001 | 0.70x | $152.94 Million | $218.68 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $110.92 Million | $256.10 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1999 | 0.60x | $115.40 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.23x | $-170.20 Million | $138.10 Million | ▼ -616.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $92.70 Million | $388.70 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $72.50 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $36.50 Million | $312.60 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $49.00 Million | $389.30 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $26.40 Million | $395.00 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $23.80 Million | $474.10 Million | — |