Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $737.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.30 Million) in one year. See Harte Hanks Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Harte Hanks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Harte Hanks Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Harte Hanks Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Harte Hanks Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Harte Hanks Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HHS market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-1.74 Million | $71.30 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-2.99 Million | $80.09 Million | ▼ -139.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $10.48 Million | $111.22 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $28.79 Million | $101.18 Million | ▲ +2083.0% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.76 Million | $122.85 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-7.84 Million | $162.90 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $12.10 Million | $155.43 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-9.18 Million | $134.64 Million | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-30.80 Million | $165.45 Million | ▼ -368.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $14.59 Million | $210.78 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $30.94 Million | $274.31 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $25.56 Million | $320.52 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $59.57 Million | $336.48 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $76.32 Million | $378.05 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $60.66 Million | $486.16 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $95.38 Million | $489.06 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $114.02 Million | $506.51 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $116.70 Million | $557.19 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $143.22 Million | $543.41 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $146.37 Million | $475.81 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $145.41 Million | $328.32 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $153.32 Million | $256.55 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $124.06 Million | $203.53 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $141.64 Million | $204.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2001 | 0.70x | $152.94 Million | $218.68 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $110.92 Million | $256.10 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1999 | 0.60x | $115.40 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.23x | $-170.20 Million | $138.10 Million | ▼ -616.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $92.70 Million | $388.70 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $72.50 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $36.50 Million | $312.60 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $49.00 Million | $389.30 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $26.40 Million | $395.00 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $23.80 Million | $474.10 Million | — |