Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $737.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.30 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Harte Hanks Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Harte Hanks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Harte Hanks Inc across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Harte Hanks Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Harte Hanks Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Harte Hanks Inc. Check Harte Hanks Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-1.74 Million | $71.30 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-2.99 Million | $80.09 Million | ▼ -139.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $10.48 Million | $111.22 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $28.79 Million | $101.18 Million | ▲ +2083.0% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.76 Million | $122.85 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-7.84 Million | $162.90 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $12.10 Million | $155.43 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-9.18 Million | $134.64 Million | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-30.80 Million | $165.45 Million | ▼ -368.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $14.59 Million | $210.78 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $30.94 Million | $274.31 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $25.56 Million | $320.52 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $59.57 Million | $336.48 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $76.32 Million | $378.05 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $60.66 Million | $486.16 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $95.38 Million | $489.06 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $114.02 Million | $506.51 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $116.70 Million | $557.19 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $143.22 Million | $543.41 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $146.37 Million | $475.81 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $145.41 Million | $328.32 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $153.32 Million | $256.55 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $124.06 Million | $203.53 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $141.64 Million | $204.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2001 | 0.70x | $152.94 Million | $218.68 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $110.92 Million | $256.10 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1999 | 0.60x | $115.40 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.23x | $-170.20 Million | $138.10 Million | ▼ -616.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $92.70 Million | $388.70 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $72.50 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $36.50 Million | $312.60 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $49.00 Million | $389.30 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $26.40 Million | $395.00 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $23.80 Million | $474.10 Million | — |