Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $737.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.30 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Harte Hanks Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Harte Hanks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Harte Hanks Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore HHS total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Harte Hanks Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Harte Hanks Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Harte Hanks Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-1.74 Million | $71.30 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-2.99 Million | $80.09 Million | ▼ -139.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $10.48 Million | $111.22 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $28.79 Million | $101.18 Million | ▲ +2083.0% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.76 Million | $122.85 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-7.84 Million | $162.90 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $12.10 Million | $155.43 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | $-9.18 Million | $134.64 Million | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-30.80 Million | $165.45 Million | ▼ -368.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $14.59 Million | $210.78 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $30.94 Million | $274.31 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $25.56 Million | $320.52 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $59.57 Million | $336.48 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $76.32 Million | $378.05 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $60.66 Million | $486.16 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $95.38 Million | $489.06 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $114.02 Million | $506.51 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $116.70 Million | $557.19 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $143.22 Million | $543.41 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $146.37 Million | $475.81 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $145.41 Million | $328.32 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $153.32 Million | $256.55 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $124.06 Million | $203.53 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $141.64 Million | $204.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2001 | 0.70x | $152.94 Million | $218.68 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $110.92 Million | $256.10 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1999 | 0.60x | $115.40 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.23x | $-170.20 Million | $138.10 Million | ▼ -616.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $92.70 Million | $388.70 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $72.50 Million | $339.60 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $36.50 Million | $312.60 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $49.00 Million | $389.30 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $26.40 Million | $395.00 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $23.80 Million | $474.10 Million | — |