Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Harte Hanks Inc (HHS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 98.2% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($370.00K) from net assets ($20.53 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore HHS net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Harte Hanks Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1992–2025)
This chart shows how Harte Hanks Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1992 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 98.2%, reflecting net assets of $20.53 Million with intangible assets of $370.00K USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Harte Hanks Inc worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Harte Hanks Inc (1992–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Harte Hanks Inc from 1992 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore HHS capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 98.2% | $20.53 Million | $370.00K | $91.83 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2024 | 97.4% | $21.69 Million | $563.00K | $101.78 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2023 | 85.8% | $19.86 Million | $2.82 Million | $131.07 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2022 | 81.2% | $18.81 Million | $3.54 Million | $119.98 Million | ▲ +105.5 pp |
| 2016 | -24.3% | $2.66 Million | $3.30 Million | $213.44 Million | ▼ -121.4 pp |
| 2015 | 97.1% | $140.32 Million | $4.12 Million | $414.62 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2014 | 99.3% | $326.68 Million | $2.28 Million | $647.20 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.3% | $349.05 Million | $2.30 Million | $685.54 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 98.4% | $328.16 Million | $5.26 Million | $706.21 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 96.6% | $446.36 Million | $14.99 Million | $932.51 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 96.4% | $437.82 Million | $15.79 Million | $926.88 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 95.9% | $401.64 Million | $16.28 Million | $908.15 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2008 | 95.0% | $356.37 Million | $17.99 Million | $913.57 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 94.9% | $408.51 Million | $20.94 Million | $951.93 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 95.2% | $493.48 Million | $23.45 Million | $969.28 Million | ▲ +87.8 pp |
| 2005 | 7.5% | $561.35 Million | $519.42 Million | $889.66 Million | ▼ -92.2 pp |
| 2004 | 99.6% | $571.80 Million | $2.07 Million | $828.35 Million | ▲ +78.8 pp |
| 2003 | 20.8% | $555.60 Million | $439.82 Million | $759.13 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2002 | 17.4% | $532.53 Million | $440.07 Million | $736.73 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2001 | 20.6% | $552.37 Million | $438.32 Million | $771.05 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2000 | 20.3% | $551.00 Million | $439.15 Million | $807.11 Million | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 1999 | 29.1% | $577.60 Million | $409.80 Million | $769.40 Million | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 1998 | 49.6% | $577.10 Million | $290.80 Million | $715.20 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 1997 | 55.8% | $566.20 Million | $250.40 Million | $954.90 Million | ▲ +82.1 pp |
| 1996 | -26.4% | $252.70 Million | $319.30 Million | $592.30 Million | ▲ +38.1 pp |
| 1995 | -64.4% | $165.10 Million | $271.50 Million | $477.70 Million | ▲ +105.3 pp |
| 1994 | -169.8% | $107.60 Million | $290.30 Million | $496.90 Million | ▲ +79.3 pp |
| 1993 | -249.1% | $83.90 Million | $292.90 Million | $478.90 Million | ▲ +489.3 pp |
| 1992 | -738.4% | $41.40 Million | $347.10 Million | $515.50 Million | — |