Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of June 2018, meaning its operating cash flow of $-55.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($953.00 Million) in one year. Explore Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.61x | $960.47K | $1.58 Million | ▲ +502.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $126.54K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-497.86K | $1.17 Million | ▼ -120.6% |
| 2017 | 2.06x | $303.00 Million | $147.00 Million | ▲ +3886.9% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $73.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $121.00 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +1971.1% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | $2.71 Billion | $7.16 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $2.06 Billion | $8.04 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.79 Billion | $8.32 Billion | ▲ +293.3% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-1.68 Billion | $9.69 Billion | ▼ -189.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.28 Billion | $6.62 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $1.89 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $2.66 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +320.8% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $748.00 Million | $9.21 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $915.00 Million | $6.74 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $2.51 Billion | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $3.84 Billion | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $1.59 Billion | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $1.47 Billion | $7.82 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $761.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $1.34 Billion | $2.66 Billion | ▲ +326.1% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $861.70 Million | $7.29 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $918.24 Million | $5.95 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 1995 | 0.71x | $772.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $910.92 Million | $860.29 Million | ▲ +708.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $559.19 Million | $4.27 Billion | — |