Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of June 2018, meaning its operating cash flow of $-55.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($953.00 Million) in one year. See PHH financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.. Check Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.61x | $960.47K | $1.58 Million | ▲ +502.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $126.54K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-497.86K | $1.17 Million | ▼ -120.6% |
| 2017 | 2.06x | $303.00 Million | $147.00 Million | ▲ +3886.9% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $73.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $121.00 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +1971.1% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | $2.71 Billion | $7.16 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $2.06 Billion | $8.04 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.79 Billion | $8.32 Billion | ▲ +293.3% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-1.68 Billion | $9.69 Billion | ▼ -189.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.28 Billion | $6.62 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $1.89 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $2.66 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +320.8% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $748.00 Million | $9.21 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $915.00 Million | $6.74 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $2.51 Billion | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $3.84 Billion | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $1.59 Billion | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $1.47 Billion | $7.82 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $761.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $1.34 Billion | $2.66 Billion | ▲ +326.1% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $861.70 Million | $7.29 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $918.24 Million | $5.95 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 1995 | 0.71x | $772.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $910.92 Million | $860.29 Million | ▲ +708.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $559.19 Million | $4.27 Billion | — |