Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of June 2018, meaning its operating cash flow of $-55.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($953.00 Million) in one year. Check PHH cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (1993–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. from 1993 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Check Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2024)
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PHH operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.61x | $960.47K | $1.58 Million | ▲ +502.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $126.54K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -83.4% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +243.4% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-497.86K | $1.17 Million | ▼ -120.6% |
| 2017 | 2.06x | $303.00 Million | $147.00 Million | ▲ +3886.9% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $73.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $121.00 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +1971.1% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | $2.71 Billion | $7.16 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $2.06 Billion | $8.04 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.79 Billion | $8.32 Billion | ▲ +293.3% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-1.68 Billion | $9.69 Billion | ▼ -189.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.28 Billion | $6.62 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $1.89 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $2.66 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +320.8% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $748.00 Million | $9.21 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $915.00 Million | $6.74 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $2.51 Billion | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $3.84 Billion | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $1.59 Billion | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $1.47 Billion | $7.82 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $761.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $1.34 Billion | $2.66 Billion | ▲ +326.1% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $861.70 Million | $7.29 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $918.24 Million | $5.95 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 1995 | 0.71x | $772.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $910.92 Million | $860.29 Million | ▲ +708.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $559.19 Million | $4.27 Billion | — |