Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 14.9% as of June 2018. Strategic assets (PP&E of $18.00 Million plus long-term investments of $55.00 Million) total $73.00 Million, measured against net assets of $489.00 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2017)
This chart shows how Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.'s Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2000 to 2017. As of June 2018, the index stands at 14.9%, representing strategic assets of $73.00 Million against net assets of $489.00 Million USD. Explore cash flow conversion of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (2000–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. from 2000 to 2017, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. stock valuation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1.3% | $22.00 Million | $22.00 Million | $- | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 2.6% | $46.00 Million | $36.00 Million | $10.00 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 2.3% | $47.00 Million | $47.00 Million | $- | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 2.3% | $36.00 Million | $36.00 Million | $- | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -212.5 pp |
| 2013 | 214.8% | $3.63 Billion | $3.63 Billion | $- | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -17.2 pp |
| 2012 | 232.0% | $3.62 Billion | $3.62 Billion | $- | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2011 | 239.5% | $3.50 Billion | $3.50 Billion | $- | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2010 | 217.7% | $3.44 Billion | $3.44 Billion | $- | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -17.8 pp |
| 2009 | 235.5% | $3.54 Billion | $3.54 Billion | $- | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -90.4 pp |
| 2008 | 325.9% | $4.13 Billion | $4.13 Billion | $- | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +62.4 pp |
| 2007 | 263.5% | $4.11 Billion | $4.11 Billion | $- | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2006 | 262.2% | $4.05 Billion | $4.05 Billion | $- | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +140.5 pp |
| 2005 | 121.8% | $3.92 Billion | $3.92 Billion | $- | $3.22 Billion | ▲ +30.8 pp |
| 2004 | 91.0% | $3.78 Billion | $3.78 Billion | $- | $4.15 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2003 | 85.1% | $3.51 Billion | $3.51 Billion | $- | $4.12 Billion | ▼ -41.9 pp |
| 2002 | 127.0% | $3.65 Billion | $3.65 Billion | $- | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2001 | 201.6% | $3.58 Billion | $3.58 Billion | $- | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +193.1 pp |
| 2000 | 8.5% | $159.00 Million | $159.00 Million | $- | $1.87 Billion | — |