Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. strategic asset allocation index. Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 14.9% as of June 2018. Strategic assets (PP&E of $18.00 Million plus long-term investments of $55.00 Million) total $73.00 Million, measured against net assets of $489.00 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See PHH equity financing ratio to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (2000–2017)
Strategic asset allocation index of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. from 2000 to 2017. This chart shows how Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.'s Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2000 to 2017. As of June 2018, the index stands at 14.9%, representing strategic assets of $73.00 Million against net assets of $489.00 Million USD. Check PHH tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2000–2017)
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. strategic asset allocation index by year from 2000 to 2017. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. from 2000 to 2017, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd..
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1.3% | $22.00 Million | $22.00 Million | $- | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 2.6% | $46.00 Million | $36.00 Million | $10.00 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 2.3% | $47.00 Million | $47.00 Million | $- | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 2.3% | $36.00 Million | $36.00 Million | $- | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -212.5 pp |
| 2013 | 214.8% | $3.63 Billion | $3.63 Billion | $- | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -17.2 pp |
| 2012 | 232.0% | $3.62 Billion | $3.62 Billion | $- | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2011 | 239.5% | $3.50 Billion | $3.50 Billion | $- | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2010 | 217.7% | $3.44 Billion | $3.44 Billion | $- | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -17.8 pp |
| 2009 | 235.5% | $3.54 Billion | $3.54 Billion | $- | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -90.4 pp |
| 2008 | 325.9% | $4.13 Billion | $4.13 Billion | $- | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +62.4 pp |
| 2007 | 263.5% | $4.11 Billion | $4.11 Billion | $- | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2006 | 262.2% | $4.05 Billion | $4.05 Billion | $- | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +140.5 pp |
| 2005 | 121.8% | $3.92 Billion | $3.92 Billion | $- | $3.22 Billion | ▲ +30.8 pp |
| 2004 | 91.0% | $3.78 Billion | $3.78 Billion | $- | $4.15 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2003 | 85.1% | $3.51 Billion | $3.51 Billion | $- | $4.12 Billion | ▼ -41.9 pp |
| 2002 | 127.0% | $3.65 Billion | $3.65 Billion | $- | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2001 | 201.6% | $3.58 Billion | $3.58 Billion | $- | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +193.1 pp |
| 2000 | 8.5% | $159.00 Million | $159.00 Million | $- | $1.87 Billion | — |