Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (PHH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.8% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($6.98K) from net assets ($4.25 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See PHH book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2024)
This chart shows how Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1993 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 99.8%, reflecting net assets of $4.25 Million with intangible assets of $6.98K USD. Also explore Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (1993–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. from 1993 to 2024, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.5% | $1.51 Million | $7.62K | $3.08 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2023 | 99.2% | $1.01 Million | $8.40K | $2.26 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | $150.28K | $9.35K | $2.52 Million | ▲ +22.4 pp |
| 2017 | 71.4% | $1.66 Billion | $476.00 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +10.5 pp |
| 2016 | 60.9% | $1.76 Billion | $690.00 Million | $3.17 Billion | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2015 | 57.1% | $2.05 Billion | $880.00 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2014 | 36.0% | $1.57 Billion | $1.00 Billion | $4.30 Billion | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2013 | 24.3% | $1.69 Billion | $1.28 Billion | $8.85 Billion | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2012 | 34.6% | $1.56 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $9.60 Billion | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2011 | 17.2% | $1.46 Billion | $1.21 Billion | $9.78 Billion | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2010 | 8.6% | $1.58 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $11.27 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2009 | 6.1% | $1.50 Billion | $1.41 Billion | $8.12 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2008 | -1.1% | $1.27 Billion | $1.28 Billion | $8.27 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2007 | -1.7% | $1.56 Billion | $1.59 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +31.3 pp |
| 2006 | -33.1% | $1.55 Billion | $2.06 Billion | $10.76 Billion | ▼ -71.1 pp |
| 2005 | 38.0% | $3.22 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $9.96 Billion | ▼ -43.7 pp |
| 2004 | 81.7% | $4.15 Billion | $759.00 Million | $11.52 Billion | ▲ +37.4 pp |
| 2003 | 44.3% | $4.12 Billion | $2.30 Billion | $11.51 Billion | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 2002 | 52.0% | $2.87 Billion | $1.38 Billion | $10.08 Billion | ▲ +66.6 pp |
| 2001 | -14.6% | $1.78 Billion | $2.04 Billion | $9.59 Billion | ▼ -26.2 pp |
| 2000 | 11.6% | $1.87 Billion | $1.65 Billion | $4.42 Billion | ▼ -21.9 pp |
| 1999 | 33.5% | $1.63 Billion | $1.08 Billion | $4.29 Billion | ▼ -29.9 pp |
| 1998 | 63.4% | $1.74 Billion | $635.70 Million | $9.03 Billion | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 1997 | 75.4% | $1.51 Billion | $373.05 Million | $7.47 Billion | ▼ -24.6 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $4.58 Billion | $0.00 | $5.67 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $4.18 Billion | $0.00 | $5.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $498.31 Million | $0.00 | $4.77 Billion | — |