Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($73.04 Million) in one year. See Avita Medical Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Avita Medical Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Avita Medical Ltd across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Avita Medical Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Avita Medical Ltd (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Avita Medical Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RCEL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.43x | $-31.20 Million | $73.04 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | -0.65x | $-48.94 Million | $75.21 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | -0.61x | $-38.01 Million | $62.58 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2022 | -1.41x | $-19.09 Million | $13.52 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2021 | -1.58x | $-18.04 Million | $11.39 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2020 | -2.26x | $-22.75 Million | $10.06 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2019 | -3.89x | $-19.25 Million | $4.95 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2017 | -2.38x | $-9.54 Million | $4.01 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2016 | -2.58x | $-6.58 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2015 | -3.39x | $-5.93 Million | $1.75 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2014 | -3.97x | $-4.87 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | -3.64x | $-6.51 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2012 | -2.73x | $-6.70 Million | $2.45 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2011 | -2.01x | $-4.32 Million | $2.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -1.84x | $-3.13 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -423.0% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.36 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2008 | -3.75x | $-3.75 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -169.2% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-3.54 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2006 | -7.13x | $-7.60 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2005 | -3.76x | $-7.26 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2004 | -3.62x | $-5.03 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2003 | -8.29x | $-4.24 Million | $511.27K | ▼ -160.6% |
| 2002 | -3.18x | $-997.61K | $313.44K | ▼ -410.9% |
| 2001 | -0.62x | $-327.44K | $525.57K | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | -12.91x | $-467.41K | $36.21K | ▼ -176.2% |
| 1999 | -4.67x | $-409.81K | $87.69K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 1998 | -8.39x | $-166.28K | $19.82K | ▲ +26.1% |
| 1997 | -11.36x | $-215.74K | $19.00K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1996 | -10.44x | $-519.14K | $49.74K | ▼ -124.1% |
| 1995 | -4.66x | $-398.66K | $85.60K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 1994 | -2.38x | $-574.61K | $241.24K | ▼ -2842.8% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $33.17K | $381.99K | — |