Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($73.04 Million) in one year. See RCEL financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Avita Medical Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Avita Medical Ltd across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Avita Medical Ltd cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Avita Medical Ltd (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Avita Medical Ltd. Check how high is Avita Medical Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.43x | $-31.20 Million | $73.04 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | -0.65x | $-48.94 Million | $75.21 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | -0.61x | $-38.01 Million | $62.58 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2022 | -1.41x | $-19.09 Million | $13.52 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2021 | -1.58x | $-18.04 Million | $11.39 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2020 | -2.26x | $-22.75 Million | $10.06 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2019 | -3.89x | $-19.25 Million | $4.95 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2017 | -2.38x | $-9.54 Million | $4.01 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2016 | -2.58x | $-6.58 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2015 | -3.39x | $-5.93 Million | $1.75 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2014 | -3.97x | $-4.87 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | -3.64x | $-6.51 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2012 | -2.73x | $-6.70 Million | $2.45 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2011 | -2.01x | $-4.32 Million | $2.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -1.84x | $-3.13 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -423.0% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.36 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2008 | -3.75x | $-3.75 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -169.2% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-3.54 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2006 | -7.13x | $-7.60 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2005 | -3.76x | $-7.26 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2004 | -3.62x | $-5.03 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2003 | -8.29x | $-4.24 Million | $511.27K | ▼ -160.6% |
| 2002 | -3.18x | $-997.61K | $313.44K | ▼ -410.9% |
| 2001 | -0.62x | $-327.44K | $525.57K | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | -12.91x | $-467.41K | $36.21K | ▼ -176.2% |
| 1999 | -4.67x | $-409.81K | $87.69K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 1998 | -8.39x | $-166.28K | $19.82K | ▲ +26.1% |
| 1997 | -11.36x | $-215.74K | $19.00K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1996 | -10.44x | $-519.14K | $49.74K | ▼ -124.1% |
| 1995 | -4.66x | $-398.66K | $85.60K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 1994 | -2.38x | $-574.61K | $241.24K | ▼ -2842.8% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $33.17K | $381.99K | — |