Avita Medical Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Avita Medical Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($73.04 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Avita Medical Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Avita Medical Ltd (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Avita Medical Ltd from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Avita Medical Ltd across 32 annual periods. Check Avita Medical Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Avita Medical Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Avita Medical Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Avita Medical Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Avita Medical Ltd cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.43x | $-31.20 Million | $73.04 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | -0.65x | $-48.94 Million | $75.21 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2023 | -0.61x | $-38.01 Million | $62.58 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2022 | -1.41x | $-19.09 Million | $13.52 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2021 | -1.58x | $-18.04 Million | $11.39 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2020 | -2.26x | $-22.75 Million | $10.06 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2019 | -3.89x | $-19.25 Million | $4.95 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2017 | -2.38x | $-9.54 Million | $4.01 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2016 | -2.58x | $-6.58 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2015 | -3.39x | $-5.93 Million | $1.75 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2014 | -3.97x | $-4.87 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | -3.64x | $-6.51 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2012 | -2.73x | $-6.70 Million | $2.45 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2011 | -2.01x | $-4.32 Million | $2.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -1.84x | $-3.13 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -423.0% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.36 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2008 | -3.75x | $-3.75 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -169.2% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-3.54 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2006 | -7.13x | $-7.60 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2005 | -3.76x | $-7.26 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2004 | -3.62x | $-5.03 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2003 | -8.29x | $-4.24 Million | $511.27K | ▼ -160.6% |
| 2002 | -3.18x | $-997.61K | $313.44K | ▼ -410.9% |
| 2001 | -0.62x | $-327.44K | $525.57K | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | -12.91x | $-467.41K | $36.21K | ▼ -176.2% |
| 1999 | -4.67x | $-409.81K | $87.69K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 1998 | -8.39x | $-166.28K | $19.82K | ▲ +26.1% |
| 1997 | -11.36x | $-215.74K | $19.00K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1996 | -10.44x | $-519.14K | $49.74K | ▼ -124.1% |
| 1995 | -4.66x | $-398.66K | $85.60K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 1994 | -2.38x | $-574.61K | $241.24K | ▼ -2842.8% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $33.17K | $381.99K | — |