Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -23.8% as of December 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($5.57 Million) from net assets ($4.50 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See RCEL book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Avita Medical Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2024)
This chart shows how Avita Medical Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 31 annual periods from 1993 to 2024. As of December 2024, the ratio stands at -23.8%, reflecting net assets of $4.50 Million with intangible assets of $5.57 Million USD. Also explore RCEL net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Avita Medical Ltd (1993–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Avita Medical Ltd from 1993 to 2024, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Avita Medical Ltd (RCEL) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -23.8% | $4.50 Million | $5.57 Million | $79.71 Million | ▼ -122.8 pp |
| 2023 | 99.0% | $49.06 Million | $487.00K | $111.64 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2022 | 99.5% | $84.74 Million | $465.00K | $98.26 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2021 | 99.6% | $104.62 Million | $443.00K | $116.02 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 99.5% | $72.40 Million | $364.00K | $82.46 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2019 | 98.9% | $20.83 Million | $225.00K | $25.78 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $18.99 Million | $0.00 | $23.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $5.12 Million | $0.00 | $7.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $6.85 Million | $0.00 | $8.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $4.22 Million | $0.00 | $5.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $5.53 Million | $0.00 | $7.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $10.46 Million | $0.00 | $12.91 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 99.1% | $8.55 Million | $73.00K | $10.71 Million | ▲ +15.4 pp |
| 2010 | 83.7% | $16.99 Million | $2.76 Million | $18.69 Million | ▲ +52.0 pp |
| 2009 | 31.7% | $3.98 Million | $2.71 Million | $7.86 Million | ▼ -24.0 pp |
| 2008 | 55.7% | $6.93 Million | $3.07 Million | $7.93 Million | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2007 | 67.4% | $12.96 Million | $4.22 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -32.6 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $10.98 Million | $0.00 | $12.04 Million | ▲ +42.4 pp |
| 2005 | 57.6% | $11.15 Million | $4.72 Million | $13.08 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2004 | 57.1% | $13.09 Million | $5.62 Million | $14.48 Million | ▲ +24.7 pp |
| 2003 | 32.4% | $8.66 Million | $5.86 Million | $9.17 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2002 | 32.8% | $8.25 Million | $5.54 Million | $8.56 Million | ▼ -67.2 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $4.53 Million | $0.00 | $5.06 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2000 | 96.2% | $5.38 Million | $206.65K | $5.42 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $2.72 Million | $0.00 | $2.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.10 Million | $0.00 | $1.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $1.78 Million | $0.00 | $1.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $4.98 Million | $0.00 | $5.03 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $4.48 Million | $0.00 | $4.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $5.82 Million | $0.00 | $6.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $6.55 Million | $0.00 | $6.93 Million | — |