TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.57 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does TriCo Bancshares generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TriCo Bancshares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TriCo Bancshares across 34 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of TriCo Bancshares to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TriCo Bancshares (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TriCo Bancshares. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $109.71 Million | $8.45 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $138.89 Million | $8.75 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $162.90 Million | $8.88 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $132.21 Million | $7.61 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $114.80 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $102.81 Million | $5.56 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $91.07 Million | $5.53 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $55.38 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $48.23 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $54.82 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $27.42 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $41.09 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $52.06 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $31.66 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $51.19 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +95.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $25.94 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $36.79 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $32.14 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $32.87 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $29.92 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $29.46 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $25.80 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $22.31 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $14.30 Million | $918.51 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $18.84 Million | $886.84 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $15.60 Million | $851.70 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $15.30 Million | $832.60 Million | ▲ +599.3% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $2.00 Million | $761.10 Million | ▲ +114.1% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-11.80 Million | $634.10 Million | ▼ -202.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $10.00 Million | $550.40 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $4.60 Million | $545.60 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $12.50 Million | $474.50 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $4.90 Million | $403.10 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $5.60 Million | $354.10 Million | — |