TriCo Bancshares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TriCo Bancshares cash flow-to-debt ratio. TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $25.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.59 Billion) in one year. Check TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TriCo Bancshares (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TriCo Bancshares from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TriCo Bancshares across 35 annual periods. Check TCBK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TriCo Bancshares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
TriCo Bancshares cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TriCo Bancshares. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of TriCo Bancshares.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $133.29 Million | $8.49 Billion | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $109.71 Million | $8.45 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $138.89 Million | $8.75 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $162.90 Million | $8.88 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $132.21 Million | $7.61 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $114.80 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $102.81 Million | $5.56 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $91.07 Million | $5.53 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $55.38 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $48.23 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $54.82 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $27.42 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $41.09 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $52.06 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $31.66 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $51.19 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +95.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $25.94 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $36.79 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $32.14 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $32.87 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $29.92 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $29.46 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $25.80 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $22.31 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $14.30 Million | $918.51 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $18.84 Million | $886.84 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $15.60 Million | $851.70 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $15.30 Million | $832.60 Million | ▲ +599.3% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $2.00 Million | $761.10 Million | ▲ +114.1% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-11.80 Million | $634.10 Million | ▼ -202.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $10.00 Million | $550.40 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $4.60 Million | $545.60 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $12.50 Million | $474.50 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $4.90 Million | $403.10 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $5.60 Million | $354.10 Million | — |