Universal Logistics Holdings Inc (ULH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Logistics Holdings Inc (ULH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $25.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.24 Billion) in one year. See Universal Logistics Holdings Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Logistics Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Logistics Holdings Inc across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Universal Logistics Holdings Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Logistics Holdings Inc (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Logistics Holdings Inc. Check Universal Logistics Holdings Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $112.37 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $210.25 Million | $721.33 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $213.41 Million | $756.75 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $83.28 Million | $835.28 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $99.34 Million | $823.48 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $128.04 Million | $765.32 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $94.90 Million | $633.52 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $83.85 Million | $441.83 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $68.63 Million | $422.73 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $78.30 Million | $379.92 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $79.39 Million | $391.85 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $57.59 Million | $384.57 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $70.40 Million | $270.00 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2011 | 0.51x | $34.16 Million | $66.81 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $12.50 Million | $47.84 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $22.92 Million | $47.19 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2008 | 0.73x | $34.52 Million | $47.07 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $20.21 Million | $55.75 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | 0.50x | $28.26 Million | $56.45 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $12.80 Million | $44.91 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $11.29 Million | $122.11 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $13.96 Million | $35.35 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2002 | 0.35x | $11.04 Million | $31.30 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $5.17 Million | $8.66 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2000 | 0.52x | $3.92 Million | $7.49 Million | — |