VeriSign Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
VeriSign Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. VeriSign Inc (VRSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $231.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.06 Billion) in one year. Check VeriSign Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of VeriSign Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of VeriSign Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for VeriSign Inc across 29 annual periods. Check VeriSign Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
VeriSign Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
VeriSign Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for VeriSign Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see VeriSign Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.31x | $1.09 Billion | $3.48 Billion | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $902.60 Million | $3.36 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | $853.80 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $831.10 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $807.15 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $730.18 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $753.89 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $697.77 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $702.76 Million | $4.20 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $667.95 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $651.48 Million | $3.43 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $600.95 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $579.40 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $537.63 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $335.90 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $215.21 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $395.19 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $482.04 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $470.46 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $474.78 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $508.95 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | $365.34 Million | $864.60 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $358.44 Million | $687.74 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2002 | 0.30x | $240.09 Million | $811.89 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | $227.54 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $192.00 Million | $724.61 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 1999 | 0.34x | $14.66 Million | $42.68 Million | ▲ +165.8% |
| 1998 | -0.52x | $-11.80 Million | $22.60 Million | ▲ +62.8% |
| 1997 | -1.40x | $-13.60 Million | $9.70 Million | — |