Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc (AHT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.04 Billion) in one year. Check Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc (AHT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc across 25 annual periods. Check AHT cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-15.67 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-23.59 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -279.2% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $14.39 Million | $3.69 Billion | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $39.22 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +127.4% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-144.19 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-149.53 Million | $3.99 Billion | ▼ -191.9% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $177.21 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $181.56 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $207.38 Million | $3.92 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $175.06 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $208.96 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $111.32 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $145.46 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $130.63 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $74.59 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $82.65 Million | $2.76 Billion | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $65.61 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $144.94 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $155.74 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $139.69 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +103.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $56.53 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +177.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $6.65 Million | $337.91 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $5.73 Million | $57.94 Million | ▲ +1267.9% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $623.00K | $86.11 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.11 Million | $84.68 Million | — |